TPO 36 Integrated Writing
Hail—pieces of ice that form and fall from clouds instead of snow or rain—has always been a problem for farmers in some areas of the United States. Hail pellets can fall with great force and destroy crops in the field. Over the last few decades, a method of reducing hail, called "cloud seeding," has been tried. In cloud seeding, the chemical silver iodide is sprayed on storm clouds from an airplane This makes the clouds produce harmless rain or snow instead of hail. Several pieces of evidence suggest that cloud seeding has been effective in protecting crops from hail.
The reading and the listening are both about a method of transforming clouds to fall rain or snow instead of hail pellets. Whereas the penman of the text suggests that cloud seeding is a suitable way for the problem, the orator states that there is no clear evidence to support the convenient impacts of could seeding on the clouds. The lecturer cast doubt on the main points made in the reading by providing 3 theories.
First of all, the writer claims, experts could gain a suitable result from the experiments in the labratory. The speaker views the issue from an opposite angle. she says, while it is compeletly possible to have fine observations in the laboratory, there are enormous facts in the real world that can change the condition.
The second point offered by the author of is that there are evidences from other countries about the same issue where it could solve the problem. Conversely, the lecturer believes that the situation in the asia was different from the present condition. Consequently, she adds that asian countries used this method in the urban areas which was full of pollution. Moreover, she mentions that, we can not make a decision about the farm-lands in the United states by focusing on results of clound seeding in another weather condition.
Finally, the reading passage states that, local studies shows us a reduction in hail damage by using the same method. On the other hand, the professor thinks that there are initial differences among the weather of the places that we studied recently. Thus, she feels that other factors also affected on that decrease.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-06 | Opak Pulup | 12 | view |
- When people succeed, it is because of hard work. Luck has nothing to do with success." Do you agree or disagree with the quotation above? Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position. 66
- The charts below give information about the diet and general health of two groups of students Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 69
- In some countries, people are no longer allowed to smoke in many public places and office buildings. Do you think this is good rule or a bad rule? 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 3
- Independent writing TPO 51 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 311, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'seed'
Suggestion: seed
...support the convenient impacts of could seeding on the clouds. The lecturer cast doubt ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 162, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...views the issue from an opposite angle. she says, while it is compeletly possible t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, conversely, finally, first, if, moreover, second, so, thus, whereas, while, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1331.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 270.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92962962963 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52182789108 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574074074074 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9776963437 49.2860985944 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.384615385 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7692307692 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.76923076923 7.06452816374 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116812410325 0.272083759551 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0379000616282 0.0996497079465 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493819363651 0.0662205650399 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0650369526747 0.162205337803 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461587086273 0.0443174109184 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.