People who male decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
People are free to make the decisions as they like. In fact they can make decisions based on their emotions or in any manner as they like. The prompt says people who make decisions based on emotion and later they justify it with some logic are considered as poor decision makers. In my opinion i strongly disagree with the suggestion and argue that people who make decisions based on emotions can be good if we consider these two things.
To begin, decisions made by people on the basis of emotions can sometimes be the best as compared to the decision made regardless of the emotions. For an instance, if someone wants to make a deal regarding the sale of product from his/her business with a relative, he takes this decision based on the emotions whether to make a deal with or to just cancel the deal. The above example illustrates that the decision made by considering emotions can be sometimes very beneficial as if something improper occurs or there is a defect in a product and due to this the whole ordered could be cancelled then this might give adverse effect on the pertaining relations between the two or the bond they share from past can be affected.
Further, it is often found that the decisions made with emotions can bring lot of happiness in one's life. For an instance, if someone has to sit forcefully at a business which is managed by his/her father for helping him at the shop because his/her father is becoming older and he faces lot of difficulties due to his old age. At first he/she thinks that due to this i am ruining my life and my career. But, it could be a benefit if we look for a long time approach. As the job he/she would apply for an be offered a good position would be good but, they perform their as an employee so there would be lack of leadership qualities as compared to he/she helps his/her father for his business as here they can perform as a boss or we can say as a leader. Here, they can learn how to make proper utilization of each and every employee and this can lead them to better future. With the help of this they can establish a new company on their own with this experience and it would be a great decision for them.
Ofcourse some argue that the decisions based on emotion regarding life are poor compared to decisions made without considering emotions. But, how can this be equal for all, everyone can have their own better choice for the decision to be made and we can judge them only after thier success or failure not before that for sure.
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- People who male decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 66
- People who male decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 50
- The chart below shows the proportion of males and females in Malaysia who commonly do physical activity in 2010 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 625, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e cancelled then this might give adverse effect on the pertaining relations betwe...
^^
Line 9, column 97, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... emotions can bring lot of happiness in ones life. For an instance, if someone has t...
^^^^
Line 9, column 369, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...At first he/she thinks that due to this i am ruining my life and my career. But, ...
^
Line 9, column 503, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...oach. As the job he/she would apply for an be offered a good position would be goo...
^^
Line 9, column 503, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...oach. As the job he/she would apply for an be offered a good position would be good b...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 741, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...they can perform as a boss or we can say as a leader. Here, they can learn how to...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, regarding, so, then, as to, in fact, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 63.0 33.0505617978 191% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2054.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 459.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47494553377 5.05705443957 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62863751936 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38589447402 2.79657885939 85% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.437908496732 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 660.6 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.4716322299 60.3974514979 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.375 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6875 23.4991977007 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.21951772744 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292073695417 0.243740707755 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152279304401 0.0831039109588 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.154507506889 0.0758088955206 204% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238324137537 0.150359130593 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.146358833749 0.0667264976115 219% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 48.8420337079 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 12.1743820225 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.24 12.1639044944 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 100.480337079 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.