1
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: atlanta123
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:
- tpo 41 regulation rules for handling coal ash 80
- Tpo 29, to improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. 76
- TPO 33, Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. 73
- TPO 32. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 137, Rule ID: ADOPT_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'adapt to'?
Suggestion: adapt to
...'s salaries which universities can adopt to improve the quality of education, some ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, thus, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2330.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 429.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43123543124 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26685132527 2.67179642975 122% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531468531469 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 748.8 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.2171594491 48.9658058833 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.444444444 100.406767564 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.38888888889 5.45110844103 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245587021256 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0774270690038 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0787479916918 0.0737576698707 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156716848136 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619488839088 0.0645574589148 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 11.7677419355 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.10430107527 213% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 10.9000537634 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 86.8835125448 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.