The table shows the number of students who researched in Australian universities, and the pie charts illustrate the proportion of these students by gender. The figures were given for 2001 and 2010.
Overall, the number of Australian research students increased significantly over the given period. Besides, the figure for local students is always higher than that for international ones.
In 2001, the majority of students researching in Australia were local (33,657) compared to only 5,192 students from outside the country. By 2010, the number of local students had risen to nearly 40,000, and international research students had also witnessed a nearly threefold increase in its population, to 54,081 to be specific.
In the year 2001, the proportion of local male students was equal to that of females, at 43% for each, while the figure for international female students (9%) was more than twice as high as that for international males (4%). Over the following ten years, female local students outnumbered their male counterparts, with the percentage of the former being 4% higher. However, in the international group, the proportion of female students was slightly lower than that for males.
- The table and pie chart shows the number of research students in Australian universities in 2001 and 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 78
- Nowadays computers are widely used in education. As a result, some people think teachers no longer play important roles in classrooms. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Advantages and disadvantages of overseas studying 78
- The diagram shows how hydro-electric power is generated. 61
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sport to younger children). To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1017.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38095238095 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91735495604 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539682539683 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4328040586 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188582558284 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0974315301438 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0769399775642 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151304797918 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0887328462614 0.0819641961636 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.