It goes without saying that human being was always trying hard to rejuvenate different facets of his life. After gathering to each other in cities, and making laws, political aspect, started to be much more painted on. Nowadays, opinions are divided as to whether lots of online blogospheres have significantly decrease the quality of political discourse, especially in the United States. Personally, I subscribe to mentioned theory, but the presence of people and their rights to give their own ideas, is what, that cannot be gainsaid or abjured.
There is no doubt that since people have selected political experts in their countries by election, it is discernibly their right to know every thing about their political events, and also it is their right to give their ideas and opinions freely and easily. In the two-sides relationship of honesty, owing to the fact that people have believed in the politician's honesty, for them, it is a must to be relied on, as honest people. Otherwise, the political view of a country would go through dictatorship. Furthermore, sometimes, politicians, would be in favor of blogsopheres, because they would cause praise of people toward the politician, when they have published about their effectiveness in the society. Additionally, sometimes, such blogsopheres, can let the politicians, make a better decision, by encountering with more ideas which has been published by people freely.
But on the flip side, it is common knowledge that online blogosphere has decreased the political quality in a country. Mentioned idea can be true in some aspects. Country's political news should be so secret, because lots of reason. The first one is to secure the whole country from its enemies. It is crystal clear that when a country's political news are open in the air, it they could be also in other countries access, therefore, in such situation awareness from the situation of this country, would make a good chance of being attacked by the enemies. What is more, some news, especially political ones, should be covered in some situation. Sometimes, knowing every details about political aspects, would contribute to the chaos in the society. Some critical situation in the country should be covered by the authorities. In all mentioned situations, such online blogosphere would definitely weaken the political discourse's quality not only in the United States, as has mentioned, but also in lots of different countries.
To wrap up, my firm conviction is that although it is every group's right to give their own opinions about political views, some limitation should be considered about the publishing such ideas.
- Communication through technology should replace all other forms of communication in contemporary society 50
- For the past year, as part of an effort to broaden our supporter base, our Folk on the Air program has allocated less time to traditional American folk music and more time to Latino music and world music. In recent months, many long-term supporters of our 60
- The following report appeared in the newsletter of GoldenAge Independent and Assisted Living Facilities for Seniors."A novel therapy has come to our attention that promises to significantly decrease the incidence of dementia in our aging community. Accord 75
- The state of Lexiana, which imposes a mandatory deposit of 5 cents on all soft drink containers, has very little problem with littering along public highways. This strongly suggests that for the neighboring state of Indiansin, the best way to prevent any 50
- Claim: The emergence of the online "blogosphere" has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the United States.Reason: When anyone can publish political opinions easily, standards for covering news and political topics will inevitably 40
with more ideas which has been published
with more ideas which have been published
because lots of reason
because of lots of reasons
flaws:
The essay is not exactly right on the topic.
Read the reason again:
Reason: When anyone can publish political opinions easily, standards for covering news and political topics will inevitably decline.
You need argue 'standards ...will decline.' or 'standards ...will not decline or will increase'
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: ? out of 6
Category: ? Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 19 15
No. of Words: 427 350
No. of Characters: 2160 1500
No. of Different Words: 210 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.546 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.059 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.759 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 160 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 117 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 85 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 71 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.474 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.669 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.526 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.325 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.493 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.067 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5