The table below gives information about a restaurant s average sales in three different branches in 2016 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The tabular graph illustrates the three branches of Vancouver city restaurant saling rate of three different fast food namely chicken burger, chicken wings and chicken pasta in 2016.

It is clear from the information that in 2016, the higher number of transactions in Vancouver Georgia Street was 854, while others restaurant transactions were precisely 750 in Dunsmuir Street and 390 in Drake Street. What is more, the price of Dunsmuir Street was almost doubled of Georgia Street 10.69 dollars, but Drake Street sales value was less than almost 1.50 dollars of Georgia Street.

Turning to the remaining information that in 2016, the more people preffered the Georgia Street(405), whereas 358 individuals ate the chicken wings from Dunsmuir Street and 392 people take-away the transactions. In addition , the people of Vancouver city ate the chicken pasta was 200 and take-away the transactions was exact 190. Lastly, the figure of take-away transactions in Georgia Street accounted for exact 449.

Overall, the data of Georgia Street was experienced maximum sale and Drake Street shows minimum sale.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (5 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 222, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... take-away the transactions. In addition , the people of Vancouver city ate the ch...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, lastly, whereas, while, in addition, what is more

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 935.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40462427746 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6379811179 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531791907514 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0414235569 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.571428571 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 5.23603664747 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0970769235391 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0515929168041 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493603808348 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0725215666394 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044864949881 0.0819641961636 55% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.