Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Taking the courses of university is one of the important pillar of success in student’s future. The knowledge students take in their class form their personality and experience which leads them to have a better future. Some people believe that all university students should take history courses even they have other majors, whereas some others hold an opposite attitude. In my view, students should focus on their own major for two remarkable reasons.
The main reason is that by forcing students to attend in unrelated class like history, university decrease the level of student's success in the future. When students should be required to take history class, which is not their main major, they have less time to spend on their main courses which leads them to obtain less knowledge on them. Also, as their future field won't include the information about history, they waste their time on learning history. For example, when I was in university, I had to pass history course in order to graduation. Reluctantly, I took the course, however, not only I didn't learn any information in history since I didn't enjoy it, I distracted and couldn't focus on my major courses. As a result, I got low grades in my main courses that put me in trouble in finding job in future. If I had not had to take a history course, I would be able to find better job.
Second, spending time on studying history course that is not student’s major course decline student's efficiency. History courses seem boring for majority of students, especially those who have other majors. If students spend time on studying history while they don't enjoy it, they will make their brain tired. By losing their energy in studying irrelevant topics student's efficiency decrease. For instance, statistics demonstrate that there is a direct relation in grades of students and their interest to their courses. Researchers' investigation among two groups reveals that students who spend their time on studying related courses to their majors get better results in exams due to the tendency to their courses encourage them to try harder. In contrary, students who are forced to study special courses not only waste their time, but they also pay no attention in the class. As you can see, students who choose their own courses get better results.
In conclusion, I do believe that the advantages of not studying history courses overweight the benefits of studying it reluctantly. Not only forcing students to pass history courses decrease their level of prosperity in future, but it also declines student's efficiency level. I think that universities should not force students to pass obligatory courses.
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading passage. You have 20 minutes to type your response. 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- In general, people are living longer now. Discuss the causes of this phenomenon. Use specific reasons and details to develop your essay. 75
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Boys and girls should attend separate schools Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- summarize the points made in the lecture about save all species that may become extinct, being sure toexplain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading about safeguarding of endangered species . 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 145, Rule ID: FROM_FORM[4]
Message: Did you mean 'from'?
Suggestion: from
... knowledge students take in their class form their personality and experience which ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 602, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... I took the course, however, not only I didnt learn any information in history since ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 649, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...earn any information in history since I didnt enjoy it, I distracted and couldnt focu...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 682, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...ince I didnt enjoy it, I distracted and couldnt focus on my major courses. As a result,...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 804, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...s that put me in trouble in finding job in future. If I had not had to take a history cou...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 267, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...end time on studying history while they dont enjoy it, they will make their brain ti...
^^^^
Line 13, column 218, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...rses decrease their level of prosperity in future, but it also declines students efficien...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, so, whereas, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, as a result, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2245.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 441.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09070294785 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64797077395 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.462585034014 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 691.2 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1257434557 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.045454545 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0454545455 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72727272727 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286587047337 0.236089414692 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102085336829 0.076458572812 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389065977572 0.0737576698707 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199413305902 0.150856017488 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0134957408132 0.0645574589148 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.