The maps depict the information about the transformations in village of frenton between 1990 and 2012.
It is vividly seen that, in 1990, a cafe and a park replaced with the hotel and golf course in 2012. The school and library was same in the both year. Moreover, in 2012, a hospital enlarged second year rather than first. Meanwhile, high street had experienced no change in twice period given.
Moving further, to the north side of the figure, in 1990, houses converted into blocks of flats in 2012 as well as had experienced changes in shops with the supermarket. Moreover, to the west side of the village bank was demolished and a restaurant constructed. Additionally, the threes was converted with the technopark as well as in 2012, high street of north side of the top develop flats.
From the overall analysis, it is manifest that the frenton underwent minor changes over the period with the introduction of new facilities.
- The diagram below gives information about the number of parcels delivered by two major mail services companies from 1920 to 2000. 56
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 67
- The maps below illustrate how Frenton changed from 1990 to 2012. 78
- The line graph below shows the population size, birth rate and the death rate of England and Wales from 1700 to 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The line graph shows the channel one news viewing figures per day on one year 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 367, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll as in 2012, high street of north side of the top develop flats. From the ov...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, second, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 782.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91823899371 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77122362728 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578616352201 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 224.1 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.0277670693 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.8888888889 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244471013504 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0919710044247 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809874977831 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160729098307 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0664094151349 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.