When it comes to the issue of the necessity of the plan, some people believe that we need an accurate plan for doing anything. Opponents, however, disagree with this hotly-debated topic. As far as I am concerned, there are a lot of advantages to planing include bringing more opportunities, saving our resources, and making life more convenient.
First, most progress is rooted in an accurate plan. Most people think that they can reach their goal by doing their best but they forget a piece of the puzzle of success. For instance, an employee who wants to get a high position in the firm should know what he needs, what he should do, how much time he needs, and what skill he should improve. All that I mentioned above help him to make a fair plan and then he can efforts to obtain his aim.
Second, one of the big positive points of planning is that it makes you able to save time and money. My experience when I had studied at a foreign university can better clarify this matter. At that time, as a person who was living in an unfamiliar environment and had monetary problems, I had to work in a cafeteria after university time. Also, it was quite normal I interested in using public transportation. A high accurate plan has opened my hands to work, study, and even take part in the local football team. Besides, it had let me decrease plenty of unnecessary costs and manage my limited budget.
Third, you should cope with unforeseen problems that arise during the work with the planning. I think that a small example may give some light on this point. Imagine you set a journey with your wife for an African country. If you did not make a correct plan, you would have had a horrible vacation because you may not find a vacant room in a hotel or face the budget deficit due to purchasing recklessly.
Taking into account all factors and angles involved with the importance of planing, we may conclude that we surely need it in the modern age. It improves the quality of our life by saving time, energy, and brings more success. Of course, it sometimes would decrease the amount of excitement in our life but planing have more edges. I hope that the next generation becomes more responsible for their duties and do not ignore planning.
- Some people believe that society should try to save every plant and animal species, despite the expense to humans in effort, time, and financial well-being. Others believe that society need not make extraordinary efforts, especially at a great cost in mon 58
- "The surface of a section of Route 101, paved just two years ago by Good Intentions Roadways, is now badly cracked with a number of dangerous potholes. In another part of the state, a section of Route 40, paved by Appian Roadways more than four years ago, 66
- TPO-25 - Integrated Writing Task In 1938 an archaeologist in Iraq acquired a set of clay jars that had been excavated two years earlier by villagers constructing a railroad line. The vessel was about 2,200 years old. Each clay jay contained a copper cylin 86
- The president of Grove College has recommended that the college abandon its century-old tradition of all-female education and begin admitting men. Pointing to other all-female colleges that experienced an increase in applications after adopting coeducatio 66
- "The city of Grandview has provided annual funding for the Grandview Symphony since the symphony's inception ten years ago. Last year the symphony hired an internationally known conductor, who has been able to attract high-profile guest musicians to perfo 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 242, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'sometimes' is usually put between 'would' and 'decrease'.
Suggestion: would sometimes decrease
... and brings more success. Of course, it sometimes would decrease the amount of excitement in our life bu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, then, third, for instance, i think, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1848.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 402.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59701492537 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51818464958 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577114427861 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5311037604 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.0 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1428571429 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252555868683 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0667515747458 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545406946831 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130603442006 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0228497412005 0.0645574589148 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.