There is no doubt that the world has been witnessed a sever alter in its environment sparked by human beings. This phenomenon has impacted many creatures and progressively leading to their extinction by the pass of time. While there are many reasons behind this catastrophe, some sever ones will be discussed here, and we will come up with some potential solutions.
To begin with, forests, as the main place of habitat for divergence range of species, have been logging to construct human demand such as roads. Accordingly, most creatures living there have lost their habitat and for others, their food chain has eliminated to a great extent. This not only resulted in dwindling the number of species living on the surface but also due to soil erosion much living underground have lost their biosphere. Therefore, deforestation has caused a butterfly effect, an effect in which something will lead to other things, on the ecosystem.
Additionally, the run-off which made by human has tented the world's underground water and seas. Indeed, this contaminated water use by other species and, as it contained pollutant particles, it will result in their death. A vivid example of this could be seen in the Caspian sea where a vast number of Caviar fishes have been killed by polluted water coming from a planet near the sea in 2014. This issue will result in food chain demolishing as well.
To mitigate this human tragedy, as this phenomenon is beyond local power, a global consensus must be reached. This is the government's authority to take the shoulder of it and ratify laws for logging and provide infrastructures to stop contaminated water from entering the ground and seas without filtration. Besides, the United Nations Organization must carry out the regulation for all factories to use filters on their tented water exit terminals and monitor them regularly. If these all do not abide by all countries around the world, soon or later human beings will confront an extreme decrease in the number of species.
To draw a conclusion, as human activities have caused many catastrophes in the world's environment, this is their responsibility to alleviate the problem by consensus and pass legislation in these regards.
- 'The Internet will never replace traditional course books in schools.'How far do you agree with this prediction? 11
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.Do you think this is a positive development or a negative development? 78
- Some employers offer their employees subsidised memebership of gyms and sports clubs, believing that this will make their staff healthier and thus more effective at work. Other employers see no benefit in doing so.Consider the arguments from both aspects 78
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels health and fitness is decreasing.What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them? 84
- Recently, abortion increases rapidly and becomes a controversial topic. Some people suppose that abortion should be legal while others are against it.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 62, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...-off which made by human has tented the worlds underground water and seas. Indeed, thi...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 123, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
... consensus must be reached. This is the governments authority to take the shoulder of it an...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 80, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...es have caused many catastrophes in the worlds environment, this is their responsibili...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, but, if, so, therefore, well, while, no doubt, such as, to begin with, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1859.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07923497268 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79735123603 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565573770492 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7337868147 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.1875 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0915724284155 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0339463973204 0.084324248473 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0268298211717 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.056496631142 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00958483791537 0.056905535591 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.