Movie industry is a form of visual art comprises epic proportion of families' liesure time in comparison to other types of entertaments. Some believes with advent of technologies like smart phone, there is no need to wast time in cinema tikets queues, however others does not subscrib the idea and contend cinema theaters are the only place you can make most of watching a boxoffice hit movie. To reach a clear picture about this contovertial subject, I will put this mater into comparitive perspective.
On one side, mainly teenagers claim that having a small pice of technology in your pocket leaves nothing to be desired. Base on their notion it is sheer wate of time and money to watch a movie on big screen while it could be seen at any given time and place. My own experience contradict this viewpoint and would be a good point in case. Two weeks ago I decided to watch a movie that I realy love. Whereas I could not find enough time, I have downloaded it and begun to watch it on my phone, after ten minuts or so, my eyes started to burst in tears and I caught a bad headache, consequntly I paused the player and have never watched it again since then.
On the other side of this story, cinema fans provide evedance that watching a movie in its conventional way i.e. cinema screen, is beyond the comparison with other methods. To support this claim they point out a recently conducted research about this very issue that amplifies their notion. In this article, I have read it recently, scientists investigate correlation coefficience between level of interaction with the movie which is a pevotal factor of having fun with film, and medium of observing it. It without doubt reveals that there is an unmistakable corespondent between these two factors and bigscreen overtakes other media hands down.
On balance, having compared both point of views, it gives me the impression that the mindset favoring modern means of interaction with movies, does more harm than good because a practical view should offer more than just being time saving. As a result cinema is one of the best, if not the best, method of having fun watching a film; the less eye must not be lost of the fact that it should happen along with family and friends.
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is to increase the number of sport facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measure are required. 56
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. 84
- Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets there is no need to go to the cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed, films need to be seen in a cinema. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 89
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 210, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[5]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'recently conducted research'.
Suggestion: recently conducted research
...s. To support this claim they point out a recently conducted research about this very issue that amplifies th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 429, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d happen along with family and friends.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then, whereas, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 24.0651302605 183% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1845.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 394.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68274111675 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53675727418 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 176.041082164 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60152284264 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.4116671093 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.785714286 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1428571429 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 7.06120827912 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169763251795 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0530919070568 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047408028502 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0993406784872 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0225087127869 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 50.2224549098 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.