scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speakers or reformers ever could
It is true that scandals help a great deal in focusing attention on problems that no speaker or reformer could ever speak of. For this reason, I agree with the author that the scandals are useful. However, misusing of scandals will cause negative effects. There should be a limitation on the use of scandals.
Since the scandals are merely rumors, one of its characteristics is uncertainty. Therefore, they cannot be raised by speaker or reformers since such people are of a certain level of integrity hence cannot want to be seen to be peddling uncertain things. However, scandals can be helpful by attracting public attentions on a problem that people in authority do not want to touch. The famous Watergate scandal can elaborate it. The scandal has come to compass an array of illegal activities on the political opponents undertaken by members of Nixon administration. Before the scandal, no speaker or reformer touch this issue, because it is uncertain. However, the scandal led the attention of the public. The Supreme Court intervene investigation. The scandal resulted in 69 governors being charged, Nixon resigned, and the law was amended. It strengthened the supervisory process of election.
Scandal is a tactic to solve problems that cannot be solved by laws. For example, some enterprises try to exploit the loopholes of laws to deceive customers in order to get more profit. Customers cannot use laws to save their interests, but if they put their issues on social media, sometimes, the enterprises will compromise under the pressure of the public.
Otherwise, scandal can also explore some social problems, even some of them are not true. Many famous people, such governors or stars, have been exposed love affairs during marriage. Some of them are true, but some of them are just for hype. Regardless the authenticity of the scandals, this kind of scandals attract public attention on issues of family, marriage, and relationships. The scandal is just a rumor, yet the issue it generated have the educational meaning for the public.
Although scandal has some merits, it can only be used as a backup plan for issues that is uncertain or cannot be solved through legitimate ways. It cannot be used as the primary method, because of its uncertainty. Scandals are just rumoring that come up in the public. It is not forwarded to the right authority to be ascertained and resolved. This means that for a scandal to be helpful in discovering problems, there has to be a body that is put in place to ascertain whether the allegations are true or falls. The body that ascertains the truth in the scandals preferably has to have the power to pass legal consequences to the perpetrators of the crime.
The second ground where scandals stop being useful is where the scandals serve more as an entertainment tool than a way to uncover and solve problems. Some individuals would just like to hear of scandals to pass time. such individuals would waste time and reduce the work efficiency.
Thus, scandal is useful, but it should be used properly. It does focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could, however, there should be a body that have the power to pass legal consequences to ascertains the truth in the scandals. Misusing or only depending on scandals to solve problems will have negative effect on society
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-12 | renmingliu | 50 | view |
- scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speakers or reformers ever could 50
- In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrastingpoints of view 58
- Claim: Imagination is a more valuable asset than experience.Reason: People who lack experience are free to imagine what is possible without the constraints of established habits and attitudes. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you 66
- people primarily use the identification of the social groups to define themsleves 66
- Nation should suspend government funding for art when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 361, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...omise under the pressure of the public. Otherwise, scandal can also explore some...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 486, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the educational meaning for the public. Although scandal has some merits, it can...
^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 659, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ences to the perpetrators of the crime. The second ground where scandals stop be...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 85, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...useful is where the scandals serve more as an entertainment tool than a way to unc...
^^
Line 21, column 219, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Such
... like to hear of scandals to pass time. such individuals would waste time and reduce...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, second, so, then, therefore, thus, as to, even so, for example, kind of, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 36.0 19.5258426966 184% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2819.0 2235.4752809 126% => OK
No of words: 564.0 442.535393258 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99822695035 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.87326216964 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79455292579 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 215.323595506 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.45390070922 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 883.8 704.065955056 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 34.0 20.2370786517 168% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.6477822201 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.9117647059 118.986275619 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5882352941 23.4991977007 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.35294117647 5.21951772744 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 22.0 5.13820224719 428% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332809331879 0.243740707755 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0828344753226 0.0831039109588 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10083464754 0.0758088955206 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185684983305 0.150359130593 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125991639771 0.0667264976115 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 100.480337079 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.