Recent years, students prefer to have a gap year between graduating the school and enrolling the university. While, It has beneficial that students can improve their abilities and prepare themselves to new chapter of their life. Sometimes having a year off could impact negatively to their purpose to get high education.
The obvious argument in its favor is that pupils likely to have a year break before their university begin. This is helping student to acquire more experiences and facilitate their enrolling process. Because they have enough time to enrich their background and CV. Those can support that student to study in high ranked university. Thus, that student may find scholarship or financial aid.
There are, however, some disadvantages. Right after finishing high school students are still adolescents. It means they do not have plenty knowledge about life and so on. It may affect that child’s prospective about life wrongly. My friend, for example, she had year off to prepare to study abroad then she stayed at home and did not study until now. Because she worked in place that sells flowers and that job has enough salary to live. Then she decided to stay at home and continue to work. Taking a year break can change everything positively and negatively.
To sum up, students increasingly taking a year off after they filled their high school. It is the most alterable period of students. Because having a year off could turns that student upside down in a good and bad ways. It gives to students that opportunity to decide their rest of the life.
- The best way to solve the world’s environmental problem is to increase the price of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 67
- Some people believe that eventually all jobs will be done by artificial intelligent robots. What is your opinion? 56
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. 73
- Some people think that it would be better for large companies and industry to move to regional areas outside large urban centers. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 266, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this can' or 'Those cans'?
Suggestion: This can; Those cans
...time to enrich their background and CV. Those can support that student to study in high r...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 179, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
... knowledge about life and so on. It may affect that child's prospective about life wro...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 166, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'turn'
Suggestion: turn
...udents. Because having a year off could turns that student upside down in a good and ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, still, then, thus, while, for example, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1320.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58291118918 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575757575758 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.9139695383 49.4020404114 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 66.0 106.682146367 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.2 20.7667163134 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 3.4128256513 322% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191455613429 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560349164433 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640486236274 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127171360883 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395196983026 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.0946893788 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 50.2224549098 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.3001002004 64% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.83 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.