people primarily use the identification of the social groups to define themsleves
Whether one can get success partially depends on how this person define himself. Properly defining oneself makes one follow the right path to make efforts thereby get success more quickly and make more contribution to the society. Thus, people pay attention on the problem of how to define themselves. Someone argues that since humans live under the social context, how people define themselves primarily through their identification with social groups. This statement seems plausible; however, it overlooks the important roles of people themselves and destroys the integrity of the whole society.
Admittedly, the social groups play an important role of helping people to define themselves. That is because people are social animals that have been educated to learn and behave to fit the society from their childhoods. Their social status are criteria to measure the success of themselves. therefore, people use their social identifications as their own identifications, and they behave themselves to match their social identifications. In the common lives, people usually use their social identification to introduce themselves, such as, “I am a doctor” or “I am a teacher”. They also act as the identifications that assigned in the social groups. Doctors find out the ways to cure people; teachers educate people and help people to adjust their behaviors; and leaders of the nation try to make strategies to increase well-beings of their citizens. Thus, it is understandable that someone claim that people define themsleves through their identificaiton with social groups.
Nevertheless, people themselves are the main determinants of how they define themselves. people’s minds and behaviors are controlled by themselves instead of any exterior factors. Hence, social groups can only influence people’s minds, but cannot controlled people’s mind to force them define themsleves in any way that they do not want to. This can be elaborate in the feminist movement which first started in 20 century in Europe. Before women fight for their rights of reproduction, equal pay, and suffrage etc., women were saw as properties that belonged to men. If women defined themselves through their social groups, they would stay at home to do houseworks, take care of children and their husbands, and still be treat as properities that inferior to men. Those feminists, however, define themselves through their own minds instead of their social identification, made women gain their social status as equal as men.
Using social identification to define ourselves is also harmful for the integrity of the society. The society is composed with diverse subgroups; such groups interact with each other to ensure the integrity and the progress of the society. If people define themsleves through their social groups, they would loss this interaction with other groups since such way to define themselves will constrain their minds. If people define themselves primarily through their identification of their social groups, say, a doctor, he may think that doctor is his identification above to any other identificaitons. In fact, he may also be a son, a husband, a fathor, or a politician. However, primarily defining himself as a doctor would constrain his mind to act as other roles, which would prevent him from interactions with other groups, result in breaking the integrity of the society and impede the progress.
Overall, people themseleves are dominant of their perceptiveness and behaviors. They are the active individuals to determine who they are instead of passively controlled by their social groups. Therefore, people define themselves primarily through their own minds but not their identifications of their social groups.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-14 | renmingliu | 66 | view |
- people primarily use the identification of the social groups to define themsleves 66
- Claim: Imagination is a more valuable asset than experience.Reason: People who lack experience are free to imagine what is possible without the constraints of established habits and attitudes. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you 66
- In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrastingpoints of view 58
- an appealing image has become more important than truth 50
- Nations Should Suspend Government Funding For The Arts 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Whether one can get success partially depends o...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 293, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...a to measure the success of themselves. therefore, people use their social identification...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 90, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People&apos
...rminants of how they define themselves. people's minds and behaviors are controlled by...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 430, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'century' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'centuries'.
Suggestion: centuries
...nist movement which first started in 20 century in Europe. Before women fight for their...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 543, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'sawed', 'sawn', 'seen'.
Suggestion: sawed; sawn; seen
...qual pay, and suffrage etc., women were saw as properties that belonged to men. If ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, thus, well, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 77.0 33.0505617978 233% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 77.0 58.6224719101 131% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3189.0 2235.4752809 143% => OK
No of words: 579.0 442.535393258 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50777202073 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.90534594407 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0376337218 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 215.323595506 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.440414507772 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 972.0 704.065955056 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 6.24550561798 240% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.7882973198 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.965517241 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9655172414 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.89655172414 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.406409413559 0.243740707755 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13269956517 0.0831039109588 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0982476482705 0.0758088955206 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263326528407 0.150359130593 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0637955662188 0.0667264976115 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.1639044944 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 100.480337079 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.