eating food
The importance of such as eating the same food which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the latter proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate my views for favoring the positive impact of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further elaborate this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that mostly people focus fast food. Consequently, fast food is not best for health. Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that fast food only one day eating one week. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
Elaborating my viewpoint, there are some more merits but one of the crucial effects that individual mostly focus fast food but not good for health because increase the diseases. Besides, some effective people like repetitive routine, such as eating the some food. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favor of this trend.
According to arguments the aforementioned one can reach to a conclusion that the effect of such as eating the some food are indeed too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 254, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
... repetitive routine, such as eating the some food. Hence, it is apparent why many ar...
^^^^
Line 13, column 111, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
...n that the effect of such as eating the some food are indeed too great to ignore. ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, hence, so, thus, while, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 31.9359605911 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1120.0 1207.87684729 93% => OK
No of words: 224.0 242.827586207 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55740455938 2.71678728327 94% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 139.433497537 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 347.4 379.143842365 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0609422158 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3333333333 104.977214359 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.9669160288 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.25397266985 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293352673668 0.242375264174 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116130169865 0.0925447433944 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114042275919 0.071462118173 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211809665086 0.151781067708 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060086558996 0.0609392437508 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 12.6369458128 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.5310837438 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 55.0591133005 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.