integrated essay
The article introduces a topic of the "online graduate degree program". More specifically, the author discusses the key aspects that they are different from traditional campus environment programs. The lecturer in the listening passage disagrees and he believes that both programs are similar and attacks each of the claims made in the reading.
In the reading, the writer begins by stating that one-on-one with the professor is not possible in the online degree program. The lecturer, however, refutes this point by saying that one-on-one is up to the student, if the student wants, they often do it through emails, chats and telephone conferences. Whereas, in traditional programs, this happens through face-to-face.
The author also claims that online programs are not as challenging as on-campus programs. The lecturer thinks that there is a flaw in this point. He argues that online-programs are indeed difficult, needs a lot of concentration and strong time management skills. He goes on and says that there are programs that weigh up to 20 credits.
The last reason the author mentions that top schools do not offer online degree programs but, the professor refutes this point by saying that every ivy league schools provide online programs, only a few require a one-time residency requirement. Even Princeton has started online programs to its students.
To sum up, both the author and the professor have conflicting views and they will have trouble finding common ground on this issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 147, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...nks that there is a flaw in this point. he argues that online-programs are indeed ...
^^
Line 9, column 264, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...tion and strong time management skills. he goes on and says that there are program...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, whereas, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1286.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 239.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38075313808 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86532988836 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573221757322 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 378.0 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.5343281925 49.2860985944 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.9230769231 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3846153846 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.53846153846 7.06452816374 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.