Nowadays children are consuming too many sugar-based drinks. What are the reasons and the solutions for this situation?
An addiction of drink is need of hour for some children. A plethora of teenagers are using a plenty of sugar-based drinks in the contemporary era. This essay will discuss why is happening and put forward several solutions for this issue.
In modern times, children are tacking a huge amount of drink, which based on sugar, because some worthwhile reasons. First and foremost paramount reason is advertisement of drinks. A wast of companies are bombarding on social network or media, and children are attracting and learning from there. For example, Coca-Cola, which is famous industry for this type of drinks, is marketing their products on TV; therefore, children are encouraging and tacking Pepsi, when they are playing the outdoor games. Second reason that It is easily available in the market, so children are easily buying from shops at up-to-the-minute.
In the way of solutions, government and law enforcement agencies should apply higher taxes on the sugar-based drinks. In this case, children do not have ample money for brought the drinking products; as a result, they are reducing to use of sugar-based products. Second way, government should not give permission to selling this product to the under age limit (<18 ages’ ) people. If seller gives sugar- based drink to the bellow eighteen aged person, both (seller and buyer) give some penalty to the government. Third way that parents and schools are requiring to explain toxic effects to the children. If school gives one lecture per week for motivate to the children, we can reduce this problem.
In conclusion, children are consuming significantly sugar-based drinks. This essay explained why this nasty habit increasing and given some solutions for tackling this situation.
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. 73
- The pie chart below shows where energy is used in a typical Australian household and the table shows the amount of electricity used according to the number of occupants.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparison 73
- Scientists have been warning for many years about protecting the environment and that people must limit the use of energy in their daily lives. Despite warnings, many people do not do so. What are the reasons for this and how can people be encouraged to p 84
- The graph shows the results of a survey of British public figures that people can recognise from their photographs.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.You should spend about 20 minute 61
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legat requirement.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their wast 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 375, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ct to the under age limit ^^
Line 5, column 448, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'person' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'people', 'persons'.
Suggestion: people; persons
...based drink to the bellow eighteen aged person, both seller and buyer give some penalt...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 564, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'explaining'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: explaining
... that parents and schools are requiring to explain toxic effects to the children. If schoo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, therefore, third, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2688172043 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80729604566 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609318996416 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.1831007224 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.875 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4375 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4375 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372069403436 0.244688304435 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123999515333 0.084324248473 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0740539222428 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250502946399 0.151304729494 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0616715317212 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.