As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and mysterious.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In the field of Engineering, the steps taken for a individual to develop a new technology could be divided into two steps. The first step which is the accumulation of the knowledge, and things seem to get clear at first but will eventually end up with a profound theory. The next step is the application where various factors accrue to unexpected results.
First, engineers receiving undergraduate education will be able to understand the basics of their discipline. Basic physics, math, and rudimentary theories about technology seems to brighten our understanding of the subject. For instance, in the Electrical Engineering department, students learn the basic circuit theory which helps them to understand why transistors are used in computers enabling them to understand the mechanisms that seemed to be esoteric to experts of the field. This starting point is exciting because everything is comprehensible and coherent to the theory.
Next, they start learning about the real life technology and how the fundamentals are applied. In this stage, some students fall behind because it requires overall understanding of the field due to the interaction between various parts. For instance, students starting to learn how to design a computer will be taken aback by the intricate structure of the interior and how it interacts with the OS, and software. Therefore, after the basic educations are finished, the theory will start to become complicated to match the applications of the technology.
Finally, in the application stage, where theory meets the real world, you will start meeting abnormal consequences. The theory that you have learned will be always different from the real world because it is a simplification of it: to make a model which is analyzable, cutting off details is inevitable. For instance, programmers face bugs that were not anticipated on a daily basis. This phenomenon is due to the enigmatic nature of the computer and coding language rather than the competence of the developer. Hence, in the application stage where you really start working, it would become impossible to fully understand the situation.
In conclusion, learning the grounds for engineering might be exciting because it seems like it is revealing the mechanisms inherent in devices. However, as the theory starts to pick up it's pace and gets closer to the fields, it would need more endeavor to digest the material. Finally, you will eventually find out that some errors are unexplainable and thus yield that the field is truly uncanny.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 62 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | Persian Moonlight | 79 | view |
| 2019-09-25 | afreenb | 66 | view |
| 2019-09-05 | raolitesh@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2019-08-14 | Jethro Jiang | 66 | view |
- The following recommendation was made by the president and administrative staff of Grove College, a private institution, to the college's governing committee."We recommend that Grove College preserve its century-old tradition of all-female educa 16
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f 16
- In order for any work of art—for example, a film, a novel, a poem, or a song—to have merit, it must be understandable to most people.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your re 70
- In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. I 16
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist."Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire villag 49
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 50, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...eld of Engineering, the steps taken for a individual to develop a new technology ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, hence, however, if, really, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2150.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 406.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29556650246 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98506010878 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529556650246 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 657.0 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3235529147 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.157894737 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3684210526 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.10526315789 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112404322187 0.243740707755 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0325910612178 0.0831039109588 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.032876931396 0.0758088955206 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0646894358286 0.150359130593 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350393709113 0.0667264976115 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.