With the passage of time, technology helps local authorities as well as government to monitor both local and national security. In recent years the advantage of technology is now being used by governments of different nations to monitor the people activities as well as conversation in order to ensure danger free circumstances. In my opinion this is very crucial step for ensuring the national safety.
Although people are getting more civilized than ever before, there are still bad things happening around us. Numerous criminal activities are becoming threat to our societies. Many smuggling business, assassination, terrorist attacks are taking place in different places of the world. Terrorists get the advantages of technology. Many of them hack bank account, bombing in public places even kill innocent people. Prior to doing these they use telephone to organize themselves for doing such kinds of nasty activities. In order to chase them, low enforcement agencies also need technology. For ensuring public safety, government security department can install surveillance close circuit cameras in different popular places as well as residential areas. In order to anticipate major terrorist attack, cellphone tracking can be a crucial alternative.
Every things have both positive side as well as negative sides. In this case there are some disadvantage as well. When public call are traced by someone, the privacy get hampered. On the other hand sometimes it creates opportunity for some bad personnel from security department to fraud or harassment some one. Besides different political party can misuse this advantage in the time of election. In some cases it may also create misunderstanding and create conflicting situation between public and government.
Overall, it can be said that although having some negative issues, advantage of using technology to minimize criminal activity in society is beggar description.
- The chart below gives information on the percentages of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 67
- The table below shows personal savings as a percentage of personal income for selected countries in 1970, 1990 and 2000. 67
- Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing (for example, through cellphone tracking and security cameras). In many cases, the people being monitored are unaware that this is happening.Do you think the advant 84
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society Others however believe that school is the place to learn this Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- The table below shows the result of a survey in which people of different age group were asked about their favorite TV program Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 851, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... tracking can be a crucial alternative. Every things have both positive side as ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: EACH_EVERY_NNS[1]
Message: 'Each' and 'every' are used with singular. Did you mean 'all'?
Suggestion: All
...king can be a crucial alternative. Every things have both positive side as well ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 38, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... Every things have both positive side as well as negative sides. In this case there are ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 303, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'someone'?
Suggestion: someone
...urity department to fraud or harassment some one. Besides different political party can ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, may, so, still, well, as well as, in my opinion, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56610169492 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94443417605 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627118644068 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.5593167071 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.4210526316 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5263157895 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26315789474 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19041349889 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0476164486777 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499365518346 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107267092702 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495276432509 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.73 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.