chaco structure
The reading discusses the three main theories about Chaco structures. These theories discuss how Chaco structures were made. However, the lecturer challenges the claims made by the author.
First of all, the author states that houses in Chaco were residential. There were leaving hundreds of people. Houses there were known like “apartment-buildings” in which people have been leaving for many years. On the other hand, the lecturer claims that this theory is not as much convictive as it seems. The houses externally could made the viewer think that there were leaving many people but in fact, inside thouse houses were leaving only a few people. It can be proved by the number of fire places in the houses. There were a few of fire places without which people cannot make any food.
Secondly, the author asserts that Chaco people used Chaco structure to store green maze. In contrast, the lecturer’s position is that there haven’t been found any remain of maze or big containers. If there were stored green maze there would be something that would tell the archelogists about that.
Finally, the author of the reading claims that houses were also used as a ceremonial centers. And one of those centers was Pueblo Alto. During ceremonies Chaco people ate festive meals afther which discarded the pods where the meals had been made or served. Conversely, the lecturer rebuts by saying that archeologists have found in Pueblo Alto constructive materials, send, stone, etc. shese stull no one could expect from ceremonies.
To wrap up, both the reading and the listening are about houses in Chaco, the lecturer apposs to the author by bringing explanations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 345, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'make'
Suggestion: make
...s it seems. The houses externally could made the viewer think that there were leavin...
^^^^
Line 3, column 395, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iewer think that there were leaving many people but in fact, inside thouse houses...
^^
Line 5, column 34, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ood. Secondly, the author asserts that Chaco people used Chaco structure to sto...
^^
Line 5, column 103, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ucture to store green maze. In contrast, the lecturer's position is that the...
^^
Line 5, column 210, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...d any remain of maze or big containers. If there were stored green maze there wou...
^^
Line 5, column 223, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of maze or big containers. If there were stored green maze there would be somethi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, in contrast, in fact, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1410.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 274.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14598540146 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91556275078 2.5805825403 113% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554744525547 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6021939 49.2860985944 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.2105263158 110.228320801 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.4210526316 21.698381199 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.68421052632 7.06452816374 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.27373068433 281% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202939462265 0.272083759551 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715115109282 0.0996497079465 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132122719887 0.0662205650399 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140815598183 0.162205337803 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0969434189391 0.0443174109184 219% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.3589403974 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 53.8541721854 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.0289183223 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.