The reading and the lecture are both about fossils of Sinosauropteryx, which is preserved in volcanic ash, and indicated that this kind of dinosaur may had feathers. The author of the reading implies that Sinosauropteryx had plumage by indicating some reasons. The lecturer challenges the statements made by the author.
First of all, the author of the passage alleges that the lines in the animal body may not have any function in the living of dinosaur, but after the dead of Sinosauropteryx they may decomposed by fibers and are misinterpreted as evidence of plumage. The lecturer, however, posits that the reasons of decomposition made by the writer is not convincible. She added that the burned fossils find in the burned site shows that this are not decomposed by fibers, and the lines are the feathers of the Sinosauropteryx.
Secondly, the writer of the passage contends that as scientists can not analyse the remains fossils, they may be another part od the Sinosauropteryx body, like frill. This argument challenged by the speaker. She established that the chemical composition of the frill and feathers are different from each other, since the frill does not have carton and the feathers have, the evidence extremely agrees the idea that Sinosauropteryx had plumage.
Finally, it is mentioned in the reading passage that as feathers help animals to fly or regulate the internal body temperature, the fossils indicate that Sinosauropteryx had feather on its tail and backbone. The lecturer, on the other hand, rebuts this by asserting that in addition to regulate body temperature or fly, feathers may be used for showcase. She added that analysis showed that Sinosauropteryx's feathers were colorful, orange and white, so that they are used for displaying.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news sources. 76
- TPO-31- Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the pastUse specific reasons and examples to s 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job.Use specific reasons and examples to support you 60
- TOEFL T P O 32 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- TPO-32 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 262, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...had plumage by indicating some reasons. The lecturer challenges the statements made...
^^^
Line 4, column 175, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'feathered'.
Suggestion: feathered
...ssils indicate that Sinosauropteryx had feather on its tail and backbone. The lecturer,...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 175, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'feathered'.
Suggestion: feathered
...ssils indicate that Sinosauropteryx had feather on its tail and backbone. The lecturer,...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, in addition, kind of, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1488.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 286.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2027972028 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08501003384 2.5805825403 120% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503496503497 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 476.1 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.564633247 49.2860985944 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 110.228320801 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 21.698381199 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06452816374 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334684379118 0.272083759551 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11202148217 0.0996497079465 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744204015204 0.0662205650399 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197382619877 0.162205337803 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527055104595 0.0443174109184 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.8541721854 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.