The urban transport system receives more funds compared to the rural transport system. Why do you think it is so? How can it be solved?
The budget allocation for urban versus rural transport systems is debatable. This essay will discuss the few convincing reasons why the urban transport system is receiving more budget than rural and put forward several solutions to solve this problem.
To start with, there are several reasons why a huge budget is being allocated to urban transportation than rural. The prime reason is that urban cities often have large portion of the population compared to rural areas as people usually come to the metropolitan cities to find employment from different parts of the country; therefore, urban transport requires a hefty budget to facilitate them by increasing number of buses, and expanding metro lanes to avoid traffic conjunction in the city so, the people could commute without hassle, and reach to their destination well on time. A final reason is the influx of foreign tourists in the megacity; therefore, the metropolitan transport department requires a large portion of the funds in a bid to provide them up to the mark public transport facilities. It is generally believed, for example, that such development in the urban area would help the country to attract more tourists to generate revenue, and contribute to a country’s GDP rate.
On the other hand, there are various solutions available to tackle this unfair treatment towards the urban transportation system. Firstly, the government should take initiative, and give subsidies to the employers to establish their industries in the rural area, so the influx of people could be diverted from urban cities to find employment out there. This will give reason to the rural transportation department to negotiate their case while receiving a budget for rural areas as they would have to provide transport service to the people coming from outside for employment. Secondly, it is highly recommended that the visitors coming from abroad should be encouraged to visit the countryside. The flow of tourists would make the rural transport system’s case strong to demand an equal share of funds to develop the public transport facilities for them. Besides, the connectivity between both urban and rural areas would easy to generate an equal amount of revenue between them.
In conclusion, I am of the view that a balanced allocation of funds is crucial to the development of both urban and rural transport systems, so the government to give equal importance in this regard.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | sohailahmad | 91 | view |
- Your friend has just won a sizeable amount of money in the lottery. She would like your advice as to how to spend it. Write a letter to your friend. In your lettercongratulate him/her on their winGive practical advice on how to spend the moneyadvise him/h 78
- Your local council is considering closing a sports and leisure center that it runs, in order to save money. Write a letter to the local council. In your letter 1-give details of how you and your friend or family use the center 2-explain why the center is 84
- The urban transport system receives more funds compared to the rural transport system Why do you think it is so How can it be solved 91
- Excessive consumption of sugar causes many health-related issues. Some people believe the government should control the population’s sugar intake while others think people themselves should be responsible for their sugar eating habits. Discuss both view 73
- You are a unhappy about a plan to make your local airport bigger and increasing the number of flights were you live near the airport.Write a letter to your local newspaper. In your letter.-Explain where you live-Describe the problem-Give reason why do not 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2064.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 393.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25190839695 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83853843872 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483460559796 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 639.9 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 93.3937392577 49.4020404114 189% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.769230769 106.682146367 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.2307692308 20.7667163134 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7692307692 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355532559431 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14638561387 0.084324248473 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.078574819135 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242057309399 0.151304729494 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0675626635125 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.