Different people hold different social and political views. Is it necessary to make teachers' social or political views known to students in the classroom? I think it is not very important.
Firstly, it will do no help to the teaching process. In the lectures, all we do is to study and the knowledge that we are studying have nothing to do with the social and political views. Moreover, it will be a waste of time to do if your students have no interest at all and they are just here to study. I have one chemistry teachers before. She liked to talk about her social or political views in class. However, most of the students are not interested in what she thought and asked her to start the class as soon as possible because she always wasted a lot of time on the political stuff rather than teaching the knowledge we should learn. Showing social views or political views can be a waste of time and not good for studying the knowledge I should have gained in this class.
Secondly, speaking out social and political views may make teachers closer to their students. Speaking out that can let your students know more about you and think you are not just a teacher or a stranger but a friend, because you are willing to share what you think with them. This works well with the students hold the same view with that teachers. Nevertheless, if they hold different opinions, it may cause trouble. Some students are too naïve to know how to deal with different opinions from others, which may make them think teachers are their enemy, no matter how kind and warm-hearted that teacher is. To make matters worse, they might refuse teachers’ help and skip the class taught by the teachers they do not like. All these will ruin their academic achievement. In order to avoid this, teachers should be silent.
Thirdly, students lack life experience and they may treat their teachers as their hero and copy what they did. Actually, students are really young. What is more, they have not founded their perspective of the world. If teachers poured too much their personal ideas in their head, it may influence the formation of their thoughts. I think teachers should tell everything subjectively and offer a lot of opinions to their students, which can help students form their ideas, instead of only telling them the inner thought made by themselves. If teachers cannot do that, silence is a better way to avoid the misleading of students.
In conclusion, teachers should not show their social and political views to their students because it may cause bad influence on students and influence the class.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Leadership comes naturally; one cannot learn to be a leader. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In order to become financially responsible adults children should learn to manage their own money at young age Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In order to become financially responsible adults children should learn to manage their own money at a young age Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...avoid this, teachers should be silent. Thirdly, students lack life experience a...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, really, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, i think, in conclusion, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2158.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 453.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76379690949 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48550221284 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.434878587196 0.524837075471 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 629.1 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.074607444 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.32 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.12 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350614381713 0.236089414692 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107319799141 0.076458572812 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0828255830222 0.0737576698707 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225971020748 0.150856017488 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436320750195 0.0645574589148 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 11.7677419355 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.03 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.69 8.01818996416 83% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.