Today, TV channels broadcast man’s sport shows more than women’s sport shows. Why? Should TV channels give equal showtime for women’s sport and men’s sport?
It is undoubted true that TV programs do not present an equitable amount of showtime for women’s and men’s sports. While many people tend to oppose this trend, I personally think it’s a good idea to broadcast man’s sport shows more than women’s sport shows.
There are several reasons for this editable trend. Firstly, as the audience seem to show a greater preference for sports matches played by males, multimedia corporations take advantage of this to boost their viewers and ratings by giving more coverage of male sport events. Therefore, huge financial gain can be achieved. Secondly,because of physical demand, performances of women in athletic competitions in considered as less exciting than their male counterparts’ performances.
People who support the idea of equal coverage of male and female athletes on TV might think that this would empower the women’s role in sports and discourage gender discrimination. They assumed that it would arouse public attention about women’s sports and thereby decreasing the gap between women’s and men’s sports. However, it’s a fact that men’s sports still play an important. A research have shown that performances of women on football is considered to be less exciting than men’s football matches by women themselves, let alone men. Therefore, if one believes that a quantitve change in showtime might promote gender equality in sports, I think they are wrong.
In conclusion, while there are many obvious reasons for the inequality in the showtime of men’s and women’s sports events I think it won’t a wise decision to oppose this trend.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | buihieu2705 | 75 | view |
- Young people who commit serious crimes should be punished in the same way as adults Do you agree or disagree 78
- The chart below gives information about the most common sports played in the UK in 2008 89
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams, like football. Other people think that taking part in individual sports like tennis or swimming is better. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- the bar chart estimated maximum population of asian elephants 72
- Expected city visits by country of origin for 2018 thousands year 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 331, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , because
...financial gain can be achieved. Secondly,because of physical demand, performances of wo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 359, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed. Secondly,because of physical demand, performances of women in athletic compe...
^^
Line 3, column 382, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... physical demand, performances of women in athletic competitions in considered a...
^^
Line 5, column 399, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
... fact that men's sports still play an important. A research have shown that performance...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, while, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1421.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55078125 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14120553947 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56640625 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6383854053 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.416666667 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.577483170249 0.244688304435 236% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.224948203954 0.084324248473 267% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.153493955447 0.0667982634062 230% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.402554647456 0.151304729494 266% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131684735779 0.056905535591 231% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.