The pie chart depicts the factors responsible for land degradation worldwide. The table, on the other hand, gives a regional breakdown of this degradation during the 1990s.
Referring to pie chart, the principle factor responsible for unproductive land is over-grazing, which contributed almost 35% to land degradation. In addition, deforestation and over-cultivation accounted for 30% and 28% respectively. Other reasons are considerably lower at 7%.
It is quite illusive from the table that Europe had the highest deforestation rate of 9.8% followed by Oceania and North America with 1.7% and ...
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: rivaiw
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing their level of fitness is decreasing .What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them 46
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes. 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers should be paid according to how much their students learn Give specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 60
- The pie chart shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive and the table shows these affected three regions of the world during 1990s. 93
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relavant. Write at least 150 words 80
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 11 10
No. of Words: 186 200
No. of Characters: 993 1000
No. of Different Words: 106 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.693 4.0
Average Word Length: 5.339 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.365 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 67 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 55 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 43 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 32 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.909 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.302 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.455 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.406 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.638 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.105 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4