The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The diagram illustrates an overview concerning the information about standard carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions according to the citizens of four countries from the year 1967 to the year 2007.

Overall, it can be said that in the year 1990, the amount of (CO2) emitted from Sweden as well as Italy was similar.

In the year 1967 the amount of (CO2) emitted from UK was the highest with around 11 metric tons and after that year this amount continued to decline gradually until it reaches to nearly 7 metric tons. On the other hand, in 1967 the amount of (CO2) emitted from Sweden was nearly 7 metric tons which increased sharply after 10 years and reached in its peak with over 10 metric tons in 1977 and later it declined dramatically until it reached to 7 metric tons in the year 1987. After that it continued to decline slowly until it stops at 5.5 metric tons in 2007. In the year 1967 the amount of (CO2) emitted from Italy was higher than that in Portugal and the figures are 4.5 and 1 metric tons accordingly and during the 40 year period, the amount of (CO2) emitted from these two countries followed the same increasing pattern until they reach to 7.8 metric tons as well as 5.5 metric tons in 2007 respectively.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (2 votes)
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS General Training
Essays by the user:
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 473, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ched to 7 metric tons in the year 1987. After that it continued to decline slowly unt...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, well, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.48453608247 80% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.03092783505 165% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 32.9175257732 43% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 26.3917525773 171% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 937.175257732 106% => OK
No of words: 220.0 206.0 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52272727273 4.54256449028 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.78020617076 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29711910844 2.54303337028 90% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 127.690721649 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.454545454545 0.622605031667 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 284.4 290.88556701 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.41237113402 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 1.44329896907 346% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 12.6804123711 47% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 16.3608247423 220% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 88.4541626431 44.8134815571 197% => OK
Chars per sentence: 165.833333333 76.5299724578 217% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 36.6666666667 16.8248392259 218% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 8.0 4.34317383033 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.29896907216 70% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 7.41237113402 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.94845360825 25% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102950422614 0.216113520407 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.071316213009 0.0766984524023 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450609138736 0.0603063233224 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101704490641 0.12726935374 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430658494014 0.0580467560999 74% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 8.37731958763 217% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.32 70.7449484536 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 7.45979381443 185% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.53 8.71597938144 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 7.59969072165 108% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 41.2886597938 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 8.62886597938 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 8.54432989691 192% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 8.15463917526 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 473, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ched to 7 metric tons in the year 1987. After that it continued to decline slowly unt...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, well, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.48453608247 80% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.03092783505 165% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 32.9175257732 43% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 26.3917525773 171% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 937.175257732 106% => OK
No of words: 220.0 206.0 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52272727273 4.54256449028 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.78020617076 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29711910844 2.54303337028 90% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 127.690721649 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.454545454545 0.622605031667 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 284.4 290.88556701 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.41237113402 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 1.44329896907 346% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 12.6804123711 47% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 16.3608247423 220% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 88.4541626431 44.8134815571 197% => OK
Chars per sentence: 165.833333333 76.5299724578 217% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 36.6666666667 16.8248392259 218% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 8.0 4.34317383033 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.29896907216 70% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 7.41237113402 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.94845360825 25% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102950422614 0.216113520407 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.071316213009 0.0766984524023 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450609138736 0.0603063233224 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101704490641 0.12726935374 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430658494014 0.0580467560999 74% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 8.37731958763 217% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.32 70.7449484536 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 7.45979381443 185% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.53 8.71597938144 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 7.59969072165 108% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 41.2886597938 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 8.62886597938 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 8.54432989691 192% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 8.15463917526 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.