Employers should pay young people the same salary as older colleagues doing the same job. Which idea do you agree with and why?
Employers tend to pay colleagues of older generation more than those that are young for the same amount of labour. I completely disagree with this practice and firmly believe that employees, regardless of age difference, should have equal salaries for the same work done. The following shall explain my views in detail.
To begin with, the age gap doesn't translate to the skill difference in the labour market, thus it is highly probable that a younger worker may have more experience and higher qualification for the job than a workforce member of older generation. As an example, a younger person of the staff may have a master's degree in accounting and finances while working as a banker, while older employee may only have bachelor's. Additionally, the young banker might have more practical training for the job, than the senior.
Secondly, the case discussed in the introductory paragraph is an example of age discrimination. It is an unethical practice, because countries of civilized world are obliged to create equal opportunity and footing for every citizen. By allowing age discrimination, they put the liberties and options of their people in jeopardy. An individual in their twenties earning less than their colleague who is of more mature age for the same work has less to spare for activities they deem desirable, unlike the older employee.
Finally, age should never become a factor for distinguishing employees. Every employee is pivotal for the company and they should be earning equal wages for the same labour.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 28, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...n detail. To begin with, the age gap doesnt translate to the skill difference in th...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, while, in my view, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1289.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.156 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85663018258 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3152964292 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.416666667 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165718678385 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0646088988192 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682543133392 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113985813602 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0740309685676 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.