In modern life, humans are more likely to satisfy their demands by a multitude of decisions, one of those ways is traveling. For this reason, people have differing views about whether people should visit their areas or take a journey to new places. From my perspective, I firmly believe that travel abroad is more beneficial.
My opinion will be supported by a whole host of the following factors. The majority reason is travel outside the country will improve the level of foreign languages. In the digital and information age, seemingly new knowledge needed to be explored by other languages, and traveling is considered as the best way to boost it. The fact that when people stay at strange places where the citizens communicate by their mother tongues which means it has difficulty understanding this means of communication, as the only way to survive, visitors are forced to learn and practice it day by day. As a result, they tend to achieve huge success at a better level rapidly by indulging themselves in new language step by step, furthermore, individuals might be learned native speaker’s ton and rhythm naturally. The second reason is, traveling abroad is a chance for humans to challenge themselves. This might be explained by living in a strange area for a while. When they travel on their own, they are forced to ask local people where to stay, where to eat and how to survive, also, they are unwilling to finish all the tasks, consequently, it is beneficial for being an independent person. Finally, over-local-areas visiting will be a great value of broadening the horizon. When the rapid growth of technology has introduced a growing number of cutting-edge inventions, it is not unnecessary to gain knowledge of boosting the economy from wealthy nations. By traveling there, developed countries indirectly impart advanced-method to them so that they stand a good chance to enhance their productivity performance in a short space of time.
This view seems properly at first, however, look inside there will be a problem, if we do not know enough our areas how can we be confident about the knowledge of our country? I strongly disagree with this opinion. It is indisputable that local people know so well about their living places. Because of its visually unattractive, in lieu of pouring time visiting around the city, taking an abroad journey will be more stimulate and enthusiastic. Additionally, as has been outlined above, over-local-areas traveling considers as a didactic and recreational trip which will exert a positive impact on individuals and their country, in particular
Taking everything into consideration, it is more advisable to travel abroad due to a great variety of above-mentioned reasons. For my part, I still stand up for supporting abroad journey.
- Advertising is all around us it is an unavoidable part of everyone s life Some people say that advertising is a positive part of our lives while others say it is negative Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- The world is experiencing a dramatic increase in population This is causing problems not only for the poor in undeveloped countries but also for industrialised and developing nations Describe some of the problems that overpopulation causes and suggest at 84
- Some people think that it is good for a country s culture to import foreign movies and TV programmes Others think that it is better to produce these locally Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Walking is known to be beneficial for health and yet fewer and fewer people are walking these days What are the reasons for this What can be done to tackle this problem 84
- Some people believe that young people know about international pop and movie stars but know very less about famous people from the history in their own country Why is this How can more interest be created in young people to gain more knowledge about their 89
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, look, second, so, still, thus, well, while, in particular, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 41.998997996 162% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2341.0 1615.20841683 145% => OK
No of words: 458.0 315.596192385 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11135371179 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04311438893 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 176.041082164 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561135371179 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 744.3 506.74238477 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.684335707 49.4020404114 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.05 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218959253883 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636663489449 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510988451536 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133045144207 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0243688722172 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, look, second, so, still, thus, well, while, in particular, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 41.998997996 162% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2341.0 1615.20841683 145% => OK
No of words: 458.0 315.596192385 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11135371179 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04311438893 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 176.041082164 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561135371179 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 744.3 506.74238477 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.684335707 49.4020404114 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.05 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218959253883 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636663489449 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510988451536 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133045144207 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0243688722172 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.