The graph shows the percentage of four different types of fuels in use between the years 1800 and 2000.
The chart provides information regarding the changing in usage of several kinds of fuel over a 200-year period, from 1800 to 2000.
According to the graph, in 1800, the only type of fuel that people used was wood. Perhaps, at the time there was abundance of wood, so it was easy to get this fuel. A year after that, the new fuel, coal, was started to use by citizens. By 1900, while the demand for coal had increased substantially to nearly 70 percent, the demand for wood had fallen considerably to 35 percent. The decrease in wood was may be caused by many citizens changed their fuel to be coal, which was more practice.
A more detailed look in the second 100-year period showed that there were two new fuels which had good demand among society and these fuels resulted in decreasing of coal and wood demand. Oil and gas were introduced in the same year, 1900, but the demand for oil had been higher than gas for 100 years. On the other hand, coal usage decreased to the half of its percentage in 1900, 35 %. This proportion was same as the oil and gas proportion in 2000. Interestingly, there were less people and industry used wood and the demand for wood ended up in 2000.
To sum up, the demand for new type of fuel was higher until the next new fuels came and at the point, the old types of fuels started to decrease.
- The graph shows the percentage of four different types of fuels in use between the years 1800 and 2000 67
- The chart below gives information about number of books rented in a British local library in 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below gives information about the number of books rented in a British local library in 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons relevant 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 479, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...tion in 2000. Interestingly, there were less people and industry used wood and the d...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, look, may, regarding, second, so, while, as for, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1089.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 246.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.42682926829 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27192972436 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532520325203 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1528408841 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.75 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229481601131 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0990705293096 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0816680795696 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151757282675 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0132565968419 0.0819641961636 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.41 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.