Eventually, technology will solve the most important environmental problems the world faces today.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is believed that serious environmental issues can be tackled by using modern technology. I agree with this view since some solutions such as producing renewable resources and environmental-friendly products can be applied with the support of technology.
Firstly, many manufactories use technology to produce renewable resources and environmental-friendly products to solve environmental degradation. The overexploitation of natural fuel such as oil, coal has a serious affection on ecosystems and makes the natural resources to be depleted. Installation of systems to produce solar or wind energy with modern technology will provide sustainable energy which prevents the exhaustion of unrenewable resources. Moreover, the production of environmental-friendly products such as cars, motorbikes which use electrical energy will reduce the emissions which harm the air.
Secondly, technology is applied to recycle waste and clean polluted areas like rivers or land slots. For instance, a Japanese scientist uses a system to make the To Lich river of Vietnam cleaner successfully. And many systems are installed in factories to process wastes before being disposed to the water. The used plastics products are also collected to recycled by mordent equipment to decrease the plastics wastes which are the main contributor to water and land pollution.
In conclusion, technology is used widely nowadays to protect the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-27 | JAY9923 | 89 | view |
| 2021-08-27 | JAY9923 | 89 | view |
| 2021-08-27 | JAY9923 | 89 | view |
| 2020-12-22 | join2saurav | 73 | view |
| 2020-12-17 | join2saurav | 73 | view |
- The chart below gives attendance figures for Grandville Stadium from 2017 which are projected through 2030 after a major improvement project Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 69
- Reducing global environmental damage should be handled by governments rather than individuals To what extent do you agree or disagree 68
- Friendships can be very meaningful and special but also very complicated What are the qualities of a great friend What are some things that can weaken a close relationship over time 56
- Some people prefer to work on school projects with a group while others would rather work alone Discuss both sides and give your opinion 78
- Global warming is one of the most serious issues that the world is facing today What are the causes of global warming and what measures can governments and individuals take to tackle the issue 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, moreover, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 4.0 24.0651302605 17% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1228.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 210.0 315.596192385 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.84761904762 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.64807904597 2.80592935109 130% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 176.041082164 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604761904762 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0131453908 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.636363636 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0909090909 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.45454545455 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104038753541 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0446475808665 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441393549818 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0717784659614 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373335588689 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 50.2224549098 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.65 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.07 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.