The bar chart illustrates the amount of money spent on consumer goods (cars, computers, books, perfume and cameras) in 2010 in France and the UK. The unit measured by pounds sterling.
Looking at the chart, it is clear that both the French and the British spent most of money on cars. In contrast, the least amount of expenditure in France was cameras and that of in the UK was perfume.
In the UK, 450000 pounds was spent on cars, which was slightly higher than France (400000 pounds). In terms of books, the British spent more money on this than the French (400000 and 300000 pounds respectively). Similarly, the expenditure on cameras registered 350000 pounds in the UK and that of 150000 pounds in France.
On the other hand, the French spent much money than the British on the remaining goods. Above 350000 pounds was spent by the French on computers which was slightly more than the British who spent exactly 350000 pounds. Neither of countries spent much on perfume which made up 200000 pounds of expenditure in France but under 150000 pounds in the UK.
- The diagram below shows the multistage production of pears as canned fruits Write a report for a university lecturer the process below 56
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words
- Some people think that only the best students should be rewarded Others however it is more important to reward student who show improvements Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 98, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ghtly higher than France 400000 pounds. In terms of books, the British spent more ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, look, similarly, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 879.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75135135135 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30136999881 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 78.0 106.607317073 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.421621621622 0.547539520022 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.9456615595 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.9 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.094428507976 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.044662122078 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610714085706 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0800458271897 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0608002924877 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 87.05 61.2550243902 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.49 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 6.0 11.0658536585 54% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.