overpopulation problem
The writer of the reading and the professor of the listening discuss the problem of overpopulation. While the author enumerates three adverse effects: species extinction, rising wars and conflicts, and increasing cost of living, the professor, however, is not on the same wavelength with the author for several reasons. He explains the drawbacks of the writer’s claims in the following paragraphs.
First of all, the writer beings by stating that drinkable water can decrease by drank by overpopulation, leading to drop freshwater species. The lecturer, on the other hand, cast doubt on this point by saying that some biologists and researchers are finding large amounts of species that are not identified already. Thus, no-profit organizations and educations institutes are working hard to ensure the no threaten species, and they are addressed to ensure their preservation in the future.
Second, the reading posits that there is sufficient evidence that overpopulation depleted supplies of countries that lead to wars or fights around the world. The professors, however, disagrees with this viewpoint. He states that companies are developing new technologies that will be helpful if scarce some resources such as water. Specifically, in this area, scientists are creating incredible water filters, for instance.
As final point, the article claims that while people consider items will get cheaper in the future, their prices will rise. Again, the lecturer believes there are flaws in the writer’s argument. He holds that items are already cheaper today, for example, household supplies such as computers or cell phones. He goes on to say that it is any concern about essential items; they will be ever available for emerging countries.
In conclusion, both the author and the professor hold conflicting views about what could bring overpopulation around the globe. It is clear that they will have trouble finding common ground on this issue.
- 17 Your city or province has received a large donation or money to improve the education of children It must choose between spending the money on improvement of early childhood education for children ages 4 to 7 and spending the money on the improvement o 70
- People work because they need money to live What are some other reasons that people work Discuss one or more of these reasons 75
- Some people said that the internet provide people with a lot of valuable information Others things access to so much information create problems which view you agree with 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Face to face communication is better than other types of communication such as letters email or telephone calls Use specific reasons and details to support your answer 76
- otters decrease 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 288, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'identified'.
Suggestion: identified
...g large amounts of species that are not identify already. Thus population growth is not ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 306, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... species that are not identify already. Thus population growth is not a threaten. He...
^^^^
Line 3, column 336, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... already. Thus population growth is not a threaten. He mentions that several no-profit org...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1733.0 1373.03311258 126% => OK
No of words: 319.0 270.72406181 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43260188088 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85427630242 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 145.348785872 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586206896552 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 419.366225166 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.7508303499 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.941176471 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7647058824 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47058823529 7.06452816374 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101896169624 0.272083759551 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0355562905819 0.0996497079465 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0933326198372 0.0662205650399 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0590859334708 0.162205337803 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575543992249 0.0443174109184 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.2367328918 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 63.6247240618 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.