The bar chart gives information about the amount of money which students in Singapore spent on their higher education by genders and proportion of diplomas and degrees in the 2000-2012 period.
Overall, it is clear that the total tuition expenditure had an increasing trend between 2000 and 2012 on both genders. Addtionally, the proportion of students who opted diploma considerably grew up at the same time.
While about 9 and 7 million dollars was paid by boys and girls in 2000, the figure was exactly 20 million dollars and about 13 million dollars, respectively. In the 2008-2012 period, the figure of males steady increased from around 27 million dollars in 2008 to over 30 million dollars in 2012, compared to those of females, roughly 13 million dollars in 2008 to exactly 20 million dollars in 2012.
At the same period, students in Singapore witnessed a change in the proportion of the categories of qualifications. In 2000, students who chose diploma qualification accounted for 73%, which was higher than that of degree ones, at only 27%. Nevertheless, the figure of degree qualifications expanded to 32% after 12 years, in 2012, while that of diplomas was shrunk, at 68% in 2012. .
- Some people believe that all wild animals should be protected Others say that only a few wild animals should be protected Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Students should pay the full cost for their own study because university education benefits individuals rather than society To what extent do you agree or disagree 91
- The chart shows the average class size in six countries and compares it with the world average class size in 2006 73
- The diagram below shows the changes which took place in a coastal area called Portland from 1950 to 2007 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the diagrams below 74
- The chart shows the percentage of males and females who were overweight in Australia from 1980 to 2010
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 383, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...of diplomas was shrunk, at 68% in 2012. .
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, nevertheless, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1001.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03015075377 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86072980199 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562814070352 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4393899036 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.125 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.875 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.875 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323906839477 0.215688989381 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1548312067 0.103423049105 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101580926492 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22829903582 0.15604864568 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11671074909 0.0819641961636 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.