The bar graph compares and contrasts data on the change in the percentage of people of the USA visiting eating joints for a bite of fast food in 2003,2006 and 2013.
In an overview, the population had meals outside in a moderate frequency of once a week, or once or twice a month. In contrast, the humankind going daily or never to a restaurant remained low.
In 2003 and 2006, nearly 31% and 33% of American natives preferred to go once a week. This number is fairly low, about 16% and 20% for the people who go several times a week.
After seven years, in 2013 the percentage of foodies going once a week decreased and once or twice a month increased to 33%, but the humans going few times a year remained constant at 15% for 2006 and 2013.
Moreover, individuals going every day saw a decrease of 1% in 2006 in comparison to 2003 and remained constant at 3% in 2013. However, the same trend is depicted for persons who never went to a restaurant with the lowest value of 4% in 2013.
- The bar charts below show the Marriage and Divorce Statistics for eight countries in 1981 and 1994 Write a short report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Write at least 150 words 61
- Scientists believe that computers will become more intelligent than human beings Some people find it is a positive development while other think that it is negative development Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- Everyday millions of tons of food are wasted all over the world Why do you think this is happening And how can we solve this problems 73
- The charts below show changes in the proportion of the energy produced from different resources in a country in 1985 and 2003
- The maps below compare 2 floor plans of one trade conference held in 2009 and 2010
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... never to a restaurant remained low. In 2003 and 2006, nearly 31% and 33% of Am...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, moreover, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 813.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.39459459459 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4510757019 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562162162162 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0662574384 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.625 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157431867599 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735171012717 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671122481965 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0981839166417 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0759991121575 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.48 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.