Some people say that we should protect all wild animals. Others believe we should concentrate on saving some animals.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Word count: 331
Regarding the protection of wild animals, whether to engage all wild animals or few of them has created a debate. Great and beneficial as it may look, however there are still some drawbacks. I personally believe that we should make efforts in protecting the wild selectively.
With the infliction of global warming, animals are likely to be affected both directly and indirectly, not to mention how severe the infliction is on one specific species; therefore, people should engage in saving the wild, but in a definite number. Otherwise it would become ineffective, as that task could eventually “outnumber” what we currently have, and also backfire them, by spending too much money and leading to a financial crisis henceforth. What is more, as there are signature characteristics between species, the need to save all of them might outpace our effort as we would need a great deal of time and knowledge to find out the right “cure” for one specific kind.
In contrary, did everyone intend to save as many creature as possible, it would be better for the entire ecological system, which referring to the food chain system, natural habitats etc. Moreover, by spending adequate amount of effort on every kind, its effect could also facilitate mankind eventually, as some species can be served in a variety of cases (mostly in economic-related fields and scientific-related fields, especially in researches and projects). To sum up, it could end up a win-win situation for wildlife and human if we managed to succeed in saving the wild.
Overall, there are still many aspects to be considered when it comes to the matter of solving the wildlife crisis. Although preventing the extinction of the wild habitants is a labour-intensive task, it could be a game changer to us human if succeeded, a “win-win situation” to be exact. In my preference, there should be an intermediate process to consider which kind is in their dead-end and the most urgent, therefore we would accomplish the task efficiently.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 250, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Otherwise,
...ing the wild, but in a definite number. Otherwise it would become ineffective, as that ta...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 45, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun creature seems to be countable; consider using: 'many creatures'.
Suggestion: many creatures
...ontrary, did everyone intend to save as many creature as possible, it would be better for the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, look, may, moreover, regarding, so, still, therefore, to sum up, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1700.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08982035928 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06273230336 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604790419162 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.6551227934 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.666666667 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8333333333 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231237743267 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0843752463032 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0749525394306 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150084485734 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0987183881674 0.056905535591 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.