Some people believe that the activates of large multinational corporations mostly benefits the economies of developing countries. Other people take the opposite view and feel that these large multinationals are generally harmful.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion?
Nowadays, the international companies are increasingly expanding all around the world. While some people have a conviction that they contribute to the economies of developing nations, other believes these corporations adversely affect in general. This essay will elaborate how both of the mentioned viewpoints have their own merits and drawbacks, and I think in spite of all the disadvantages, they can bring overall economic beneficial for the countries in which they are operating.
First and Foremost, providing new job opportunities for the people is an undeniable consequence of the presence of multinational companies. Youths are the amongst the most influential groups since many of these companies are seeking for young talents who urge to gain experience to be developed. I remember, when I was newly graduated from university, Unilever, which is one of the biggest multinational companies, advertised a vacant position for fresh-graduated students and I applied for it. That valuable work-experience gave me the great exposure to professional environment which led to achieve further prosperity in my career. Furthermore, these companies usually propose higher salary to their employees so that the job satisfaction will be increased. I cannot forget how much I bought my desire stuffs which I could not have afforded before my job in Unilever.
Another vital point which needs to be taken into consideration is that by the commencement of multinational companies is equal to eradicating the local businesses. Undoubtedly, many of small internal manufactories cannot compete with foreign companies in terms of either the volume of investment or production so that they inevitably may shut down their operation. Nestle is producing infant food with high quality and standard and when it starts working in my country all people opt to choose this new brand in spite of its higher price. In addition, international corporations typically prefer to bring some foreign work-force which are assigned for higher positions. This means that, although they provide some chances for domestic labors, some limitations are applied which restrict them in the offered work experience.
On the basis of the point mentioned above activation of multinational companies can directly or indirectly boost economic of the developing countries and I strongly believe the corresponding disadvantages can be ignored.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-23 | Ngọc Lam | 84 | view |
| 2020-06-18 | Linhthuy0104 | 73 | view |
| 2020-06-18 | Linhthuy0104 | 73 | view |
| 2020-06-18 | Linhthuy0104 | 73 | view |
| 2020-06-18 | Linhthuy0104 | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
- A/D: Students should not take part-time jobs while they are studying in university. 73
- TPO 13 81
- Do you agree or disagree: “In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.”? 90
- TPO 32 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 230, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...r believes these corporations adversely affect in general. This essay will elaborate how ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 260, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'gaining'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'urge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: gaining
... are seeking for young talents who urge to gain experience to be developed. I remember,...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, may, so, while, i think, in addition, in general, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2042.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56403269755 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23268955519 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591280653951 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 647.1 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8187002411 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.133333333 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4666666667 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73333333333 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155747030769 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0534085627968 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659029272186 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103844911207 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0337077584655 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.