People in community now could buy cheaper consumer goods Do the advantages outweight the disadvantages

The cheaper consumer products are bought by individuals in contemporary era. It is believed that the benefits of this are multiple of drawbacks.

On the plus side, the advantages for people to purchase this goods are manifold. To begin with, buying inexpensive shopper products can be lead to save money by customers. Simply put, they can purchase low cost goods and pay less money, then they have more money for buying another goods or invest in other domains. A good illustration for this is purchasing cheaper cell phone which is same as expensive cell phone in capabilities as an example; will save more money to invest in bourse. Furthermore, when people buy low priced products, they could help to producers to increase their profits. That is to say, the economic boom in today’s society is caused by buying more goods by consumers. Take a low cost car which are produced by a company as an example; will increase profit of these company in the future.

On the flip side, the the downside cannot be ignored. Buing low cost goods can be risky for consumers. Simply put if purchase cheaper products, they may not satisfy with that product because low cost goods my not have all original goods’s attributes. Take a computer which is cheaper than others as an example; it may not has as much quality as others. Besides, purchasing cheaper goods may be dangerous for people. That is to say, it is possible to buy fake products instead of genuine. Take a pair of low cost shoes which are not original as an example; they will eventually dangerous for them.

To conclude, it seems that the pros of buying cheaper consumer goods are manifold of their cons. Buying low cost goods can help customers to reserve more money and it aids producers to have better gain.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 17, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...ltiple of drawbacks. On the plus side,the advantages for people to purchase this ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 56, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...e,the advantages for people to purchase this goods are manifold. To begin with, buyi...
^^^^
Line 3, column 784, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this company' or 'these companies'?
Suggestion: this company; these companies
... as an example; will increase profit of these company in the future. On the flip side, the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 19, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...any in the future. On the flip side, the the downside cannot be ignored. Buing low c...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 19, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...any in the future. On the flip side, the the downside cannot be ignored. Buing low c...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 17, Rule ID: IT_SEAMS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'seems'?
Suggestion: seems
...dangerous for them. To conclude, it seams that the pros of buying cheaper consume...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, if, may, so, then, to begin with, that is to say

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1467.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79411764706 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52867066206 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477124183007 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.617735462 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.5 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.16666666667 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208612336608 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076943976874 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596217955136 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142317383044 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430292284944 0.056905535591 76% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.