The line graph illustrates acid level in mouth overtime after consuming sugary foods and the possibility of tooth decay occurrence. From the graph, it obvious that ph level lower than 5.5 is more likely to cause harmful effect on our tooth.
The given graph shows that ph level of all three sweet foods (honey, cane sugar, fruit sugar) is 7 at the moment they are eaten. After 5 minutes, foods that contain cane sugar become very acidic, with 3.5 ph value. The ph level for honey and fruit sugar are also dropped to 5 and 4 respectively, which are less acidic than that of cane sugar. After 15 minutes, honey becomes more alkalic and tooth decay is more unlikely to happen. However, cane sugar and fruit sugar remain under risk level at this moment.
Fruit sugar has a high possibility to cause tooth decay within 20 minutes after the food is eaten. After that, fruit sugar becomes more alkalic and surpass the danger level. Cane sugar takes longer to reach that state, around 30 minutes after consumption.
The figures imply that low ph level is more likely to cause tooth decay and foods made with honey and fruit sugar are better for dental health as they cause less decay.
- Eating sweet foods produces acid in the mouth which can cause tooth decay High acid levels are measured by low pH values Describe the information below and discuss the implications for dental health You should write at least 150 words 79
- Scientists believe computers will become more intelligent than human beings Some people think the development have a positive impact others think it is negative To what extend do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 975.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66507177033 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.02121256798 2.65546596893 76% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531100478469 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.2049758227 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.6363636364 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.54545454545 5.23603664747 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21424915327 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0996170599598 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706579006909 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16305142571 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.063325602135 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.