agree or disagree?
for the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children (five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities.
The most prevalent aim of every society is development, which the governments put all their effort into achieving that. While many believe that this goal will obtain by allocating money to universities, others claim that investing on youngsters is the best way for developing a country. I firmly concede with the rearmost group for two main reasons, on which I will elaborate in the ensuing paragraphs.
To begin with, by spending money on very young children, the society will have much more sophisticated workforce in the future that can play a great rule in the developing of a country. To be more specific, nowadays, in school children learn broad range of different topics, which many of them will not useful for their future life because it is not based on their passion and talent. If government spend money on children who are studying in elementary schools, administrators can perform some experiment to distinguish the talents of students. This will lead students to narrow down their studying topics and do not waste their time on unrelated class materials. This kind of students who just learn about their desired topics become more experienced and professional in less time than others. In this regard, a country with young and sophisticated workforce can overcome many hurdles and increase its income faster than other countries, which leads that country to development.
Secondly, if the officials allocate money of very young children, this will have broader impact on society, which soar the probability of reaching the goal of development in a country. To be crystal clear, going to schools for children in obligatory in many countries, but further education is optional. Therefore, the impact of the investment in children will increase the chance of development. This is because more population can be affected by that. Moreover, the education of the children is more effective than that of the adults because that educational material stuck on the mind of children and can become one of the parts of their personality, which lasts for long years. In this regard, allocating budget for educating children will cover more members of the society in less age, which lead them to become more efficient parts of the community. By having more informed and educated people, a country's development is more likely.
In conclusion, expending money on very young pupils is clever choice for growth of the society. This is because not only the workforce of a country will become more sophisticated, but also more people will be impacted by this investment, which can help the development of a country.
- tpo18 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In today s world it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In order to become financially responsible adults children should learn to manage their own money at young age 65
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2187.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 428.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10981308411 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80663693622 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474299065421 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 676.8 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7131758298 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.5 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7777777778 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28544389896 0.236089414692 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10340796708 0.076458572812 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064014468399 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189078227003 0.150856017488 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516514274915 0.0645574589148 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.