The pie charts compare the percentage of working population in different sectors between Towns A and B in 1960 and 2010.
Overall, it is clear that in 1960, the sales was the sectors which attracted more employees than others in both Towns A and B. Nevertheless, many significant changes were taken place after 50 years mainly in the manufacturing and the sales.
In terms of the services, the sector accounted for 30% in Town A in 1960, compared to that of Town B, at only 20%. Besides, the percentage of those working in the sales was the highest in both Towns A and B in 1960, at 29% and 70%, respectively. In contrast, the lowest proportion in 1960 was the manufacturing, at only 29% in Town A and 10% in Town B.
The workforce had many considerable alternations after 50 years. In 2010, while the percentage of people participating in the manufacturing significantly expanded up to 64% in Town A, that of Town B was at only 25%. However, a number of employees in Town B concentrated on the sales, which accounted for 53%, compared to 20% of Town A. Finally, 16% of workers in Town A took part in the service sector, which was lower than that of Town B by 6%
- Some people believe that all wild animals should be protected Others say that only a few wild animals should be protected Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- More and more people in the city live in homes with small spaces or no outdoor areas Do you think it is a negative or positive development 89
- Government should invest in teaching science subjects rather than other subjects in order for a country to develop and progress To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- In many countries not enough students are choosing to study science subjects What are the causes And what will be the effects on society 78
- The diagram shows the small-scale production of smoked fish 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, however, if, nevertheless, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 955.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48356807512 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92040667628 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488262910798 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.8518584304 43.030603864 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.5 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345806326273 0.215688989381 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154981279743 0.103423049105 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128941546095 0.0843802449381 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261288853135 0.15604864568 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.144698381558 0.0819641961636 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.7 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.