Some people point that experiential learning (i.e. learning by doing it) can work well in formal education. However, others think a traditional form of teaching is the best. Do you think experiential learning can work well in high schools or colleges? #56
Quality of education depends on people’s conception as well as time period. Some people think that learning with doing practical is the quality education in formal education, while others maintain that traditional concept of teaching is the best. This essay will discuss why experimental teaching will be beneficial in colleges or in high school.
In the development of advance technology, the modernization in the teaching system from traditional system to experimental system will be the beneficial to the learners. The rapid upgrade in different kind teaching style will impact on both learner and teacher. For example- leaner can apply the theoretical knowledge and demonstrate that gaining knowledge at the same time. As a result of learning with doing at same time develops knowledge and skills at a same time.
Despite the experimental learning, some people think that learning with doing teaching method never replace the traditional style of teaching. Most of the people are used to with the past system of education where people only get theoretical knowledge and practical knowledge is low. For my instance, learners who are getting traditional form of education they only answer the question but find hard to do the demonstration.
To conclude, experimental learning is rapidly taking over the traditional form of teaching. In my opinion, it is only the matter of how learner gets better education with dramatic change in system of education.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 205, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ers. The rapid upgrade in different kind teaching style will impact on both learn...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, well, while, for example, as a result, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 20.9802955665 43% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1230.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 230.0 242.827586207 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34782608696 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92975092008 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 139.433497537 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513043478261 0.580463131201 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 383.4 379.143842365 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.1333840339 50.4703680194 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.5 104.977214359 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1666666667 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283137172248 0.242375264174 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108288117657 0.0925447433944 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0967283376576 0.071462118173 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180204438477 0.151781067708 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0949428002918 0.0609392437508 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 12.6369458128 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 55.0591133005 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 63.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.