Nowadays, children watch TV more than they did in the past. Reasons? Measures?
In recent decades, the issue of children’s TV addiction has aroused people’s discussion. Although this problem can be attributed for a whole host of reasons, some feasible solutions can be found to address it.
Some convincing reasons can be cited to explain for the emergence of the problem. Firstly, since the considerable growth of state-of-the-art technology allows televisions to offer their viewers not only attractive images but also sound and visual effects, these intriguing things would evoke children’s curiosity. For example, a variety of films with catchy music and authentic images makes kids binge-watch most of the time, which greatly yields to children’s addiction on televisions. Secondly, due to devoting too much time and effort to constantly doing work, parents pay less attention on their offspring and do not provide them with outdoor activities. Therefore, children are reliant on TVs as mental rewards, potentially not only making children addicted to electric devices, particularly televisions but also leading to their sedentary lifestyle in the near future.
An array of effective measures can be identified to break screen habit in children.
Initially, by setting time limit when children watch televisions, parents are able to east the time that children glues eyes on TVs. This means that their offspring should only watch TVs on a certain time, which gradually helps break the screen habit in children. Additionally, if more fun alternatives were provided, children would be able to lead a proactive lifestyle. For instance, their offspring should be given opportunities to participate in extracurricular activities such as playing sports or learning how to cook, which in turn are beneficial for children’s physical and intellectual development.
In conclusion, today’s kids are inclined to get addicted to TVs because of not only an authentic environment of televisions but also lack of parents’ consideration. Nevertheless, some feasible solutions should be taken into consideration such as time limit and more recreational activities offered.
- The technology development has affected social relationships from person to person Do the positive aspects of this trend outweigh the negative aspects 84
- Nowadays children watch TV more than they did in the past Reasons Measures 89
- Nowadays children watch TV more than they did in the past Reasons Measures 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1784.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64556962025 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19755579824 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601265822785 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.2586142532 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.230769231 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3076923077 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2307692308 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146088632418 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552876597783 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041491233739 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0808759243498 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355855915292 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.