Some people believe that professional sportsmen and women are paid too much money nowadays in relation to their usefulness to society. Do you agree or disagree?
The issue of whether sports professionals are overpaid in comparison to their contribution to society or not has been a contentious one. Personally, I believe that professional sports salaries are fair.
In the first place, the sports stars earn a great deal of money due to the entertaining purpose of sports. To begin with, sports is a multi-million-pound industry. There are a large nummber of audiences who are willing to pay such a huge smount of money just to pay for the match ticket. Moreover, televised games or events with the sport theme attract many viewers on a regular basis. It is because watching sports has becoming the most ubiquitous leisure activity in every household all over the world.
In the second place, top sports players deserve a revenue of such money because of what they had sacrificed for their career path. It is undeniable that being a top sports stars requires hours of practicing to develop their fitness and skills. Furthermore, during the competition or even just the daily training, sportsmen and women have to suffer from light injuries to the serious ones, which can put an end to their career and enthusiasm at any time. Take Cong Vinh, a famous football player in Vietnam, as a prime example. He had spent 10 years rigorously training before becoming a well-known sports professional. In fact, a sports career may only last 10 years, which is quite short compared to any other occupations.
In conclusion, it is my belief that the top sports stars' salaries are fair and balanced regarding to what they contribute to society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-07 | ngansmind29@gmail.com | 90 | view |
| 2015-03-24 | bocahnakal | 57 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, regarding, second, so, thus, well, in conclusion, in fact, to begin with, in the first place, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1313.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95471698113 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84825429163 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.622641509434 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 396.0 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4492938259 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.7857142857 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9285714286 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2142857143 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0888831523015 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0318894480598 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390829776578 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0589298415256 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536412692295 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.