Artificial intelligence will soon replace teachers in the classroom. Do you agree with this statement? What is an alternative to traditional face to face teaching?
it is argued that the teaching profession will soon become obsolete because it will be overtaken by artificial intelligence. This essay disagrees with this statement because teaching requires a certain level of human intervention and advancements in technology can only aid teachers in their profession and not take their place.
Becoming a teacher is supposed to be one of the noblest professions of all. The purpose of the teaching profession is not dissemination of information in a classroom. They are also looked upon as caretakers and people with wisdom who guide each and every child as he/she goes through different stages of learning. One child may differ from the other as every child has a different temperament, and to deal with that, the teacher may have to get involved at an intricate level after understanding the child’s needs. Artificial intelligence can only spread information in a classroom, it cannot understand the psychology of the child. In a recent survey of high school kids, it was found that an astonishing 98% of them preferred human teachers to robots. This only proves that machines can give information but not not empathise and share wisdom.
Innovations in technology have given students many opportunities and arenas to learn from and participate in. Though physical teaching still counts for most part of traditional learning atmospheres, digital or online learning is soon becoming a major trend. One can be sitting in India and learn from a recorded online video of a teacher in the United States which was not possible until a few years ago. People all over the wold have seized this moment and have taken to online learning with great zest. Though this still is face to face, but through a digital medium.
In conclusion, though artificial intelligence has taken commendable strides in the area of teaching it can never become a substitute to actual human teachers. There is a sense of responsibility and pride which comes with the profession of teaching and that cannot be entrusted upon a machine.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-25 | balaprasant08 | 61 | view |
| 2022-04-25 | balaprasant08 | 56 | view |
| 2022-04-24 | balaprasant08 | 61 | view |
| 2020-04-09 | Aal | 73 | view |
- Wealthy nations should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters Do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think that studying history is a waste of time while others think that it is essential to learn Discus both sides and give your opinion 78
- The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phones should e banned like smoking To what extent do you agree or disgree 61
- All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric cars should replace them Do you agree or disagree 67
- You have a problem with your neighbour Write a letter to your neighbour In your letter Describe the problem Say how long it has been a problem Explain what action you want the neigbour to take 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
it is argued that the teaching profession ...
^^
Line 3, column 811, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: not
... that machines can give information but not not empathise and share wisdom. Innovat...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, so, still, as to, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1716.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10714285714 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91357951294 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532738095238 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8265373166 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.25 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5625 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248508976567 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0780155969369 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540819967025 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1427285139 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373460415609 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.