Nowadays, there are many countries which have more young people than old people. Some people say that it is a perfect move. Some others argue that having too many young people will lead to some problems. This essay will discuss of strengths and weaknesses of having young people in a country.
The very first strength of having young people is that the country will have enough employees in the future. They are young and obviously they can work. In some country, for instance Japan, the government encourage their citizens to have more than one kid. Japan is known as a country where population aging is a big issue. The next strength is government will pay less money on health care system because young people are much stronger than the elders.
However, having too many young people in a country still has many weaknesses. When there are too many young people, unemployment will increase rapidly. There will not be enough jobs for too many people, especially for those who are not qualified. When they realize they are not qualified, they will study. That will lead to another problem: not enough schools for them to learn.
Another problem is when there are many students at school, teachers will not take care for all of the students at school. In some cases, such as when students don’t understand the lessons clearly, they will not have the opportunities to meet their professors because they are too busy.
In conclusion, countries which have more young people than old people should concern more about the education and occupation for every citizen.
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages 67
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 92, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...school, teachers will not take care for all of the students at school. In some cases, such...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, still, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 1.00243902439 1197% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 3.15609756098 380% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 17.0 5.60731707317 303% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1303.0 965.302439024 135% => OK
No of words: 265.0 196.424390244 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91698113208 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3230882577 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490566037736 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 387.0 283.868780488 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 8.94146341463 190% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.0221693385 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.6470588235 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5882352941 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.82352941176 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135307193327 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0596244414089 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408733779211 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0927341645139 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486032124016 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 11.4329268293 44% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.