The maps below show a bookstore in 2000 and now. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given maps illustrate the recognizable differences of a bookstore in two points of time, specifically in 2000 and now. Overall, there are various alternatives, in terms of the positions of Art, Hobbies, Cookery and Non-Fiction; meanwhile, few newly-born areas are accompanied to the bookstore’s space, which broadens the infrastructure of this place.
First of all, it is strikingly figured out that three areas providing information about Art, Hobbies and Cookery for the customers currently are placed at the previous position of Fiction and arranged side by side to Fiction which is narrowed into the small area.
Besides, the central area in the middle of the bookstore previously spent for Art, Hobbies and Cookery in 2000 is now transformed into tables for the resting and reading activities. Beneath this area is the coffee region, which is converted from the area for Non-fiction. Following this change, the placement of Non-fiction is also substantially noticeable. The current position of it is the replacement of Fiction area in 2000.
Regardless, there remain some unchanged regions located near the entrance including Service Desk, Travel and New Books sites.
- process diagram analysis 89
- Some people think that physical strength is important for success in sport while other people think that mental strength is more important Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- Process diagram 89
- The maps below show a bookstore in 2000 and now Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Some people think that job satisfaction is more important than job security while some people think that they cannot always expect job satisfaction a permanent job is more important Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, if, so, while, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1002.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44565217391 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0430123867 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608695652174 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.31084608 43.030603864 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.25 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0848378825235 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0452786523892 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555734261721 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0500097528564 0.15604864568 32% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0444278067472 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.06136585366 124% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.