Some people think that the range of technology currently available is increasing the gap between rich people and poor people Others think that it is causing the opposite effect Discuss both views and give your opinion

Technology is flourishing by leaps and bounds. Often, some section of the society believes that these technological tools are widening the gaps between affluent and weaker class. However, in my opine there is an adverse impact and I will share my ideas on both these opposite views.

There are innumerable factors to accord that technology had reduced the gap between two opposite groups in society, i.e economically stronger and weaker. Availabilty of Internet in low cost is the one such tool that had bringed people together. This is because, with the socializing apps such as Facebook, Instagram, people could make new friends on the basis of the idealogy, irrespective of the economically status. Moreover, internet provides education free of cost regardless of the social status. Hence, it brings all the people to a common platform in terms of learning thus providing equal job opportunites.

On the opposite angle, there are certain luxurious services that are accelerating the gap between rich and poor. At the top of all there comes medical treatment. Some critical illnesses like cancer or aids are difficult to cure for weaker section because there needs an enormous amount. Hence, affluent class will have no issue in terms of money for having these medical procedures. Along with it, certain facilities like enjoying business class travel, is also stengthening this gap. As everyone could not afford this lavishing commute because prices are very high, resulting to discripmination.

Considering and keenly examining the above-cited information it can be recapitulated that modern technology is both inclining and declining this gap between these two opposite sections of the society. However, education through internet plays an indispensable role by which it is worth to say that the difference is reducing.

Votes
Average: 9.3 (3 votes)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, moreover, so, then, thus, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1546.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38675958188 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88867196028 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606271777003 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.6752807844 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.625 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9375 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6875 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178809934454 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0532775696762 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490954262073 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100366210181 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0273760255208 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.