There are several categories to estimate how great the nation is. To be sure, two of the best ways are to measure how their citizens live well and to find what great achievements made by its rulers, artists, or scientist. Former side has some benefit to measure the great nation, however, I largely agree with that both of them are significantly important to decide which country is great.
Admittedly, no one says that it is great nation for its residents if people do not enjoy basic elements of life, such as adequate jobs, safe house, or enough foods. For example, we cannot agree with that North Korea is doing well for their people, even if there are plenty of programmers who are competitive to world-class hackers. There were several competitive artist in Nazi German but it would be hard to consider Nazi German was great nations. Like this, the general welfare of its people is more good indicator for measuring a nation than accomplishment of individuals.
However, a great achievement of some pioneering people is also valid indicators for a great nation because their achievement could influence the general welfare of its people. The case of Tony Blaire clearly illustrates why certain accomplishment is fundamental to a nation. Tony Blair implemented some sort of economic policies, including minimum wage. This policy has assured people’s adequate wage for living and played a large role of improving our standard of life. In addition, Lincoln’s emancipation of slavery promoted the idea of racial equality and contributed to principle of equality, making the world more just.
Furthermore, great scientific breakthroughs may influence our standard of life, therefore it is be a good indicator for a great nation. For instance, due to Marie Curie’s theory of radioactivity, now we can develop technique of detecting a cancer tumor. Thanks to Newton and Einstein, it is possible for us to understand our planet, physical world, even space-time. By adapting their theory, we have achieved to improve our welfare, thus a great success of individual may be the condition of people’s sufficient condition of living. In according to this, it is plausible to say certain achievement could be a proper criteria to evaluate a nation.
Thus, the author’s statement only holds true in some cases but it is not necessarily acceptable in general because a great success of certain individuals may be result in improving general welfare of people of nation. In summary, we need to take both sides to measure a great nation to evaluate diverse aspect of nations.
- An innovative treatment has come to our attention that promises to significantly reduce absenteeism in our schools and workplaces A study reports that in nearby East Meria where fish consumption is very high people visit the doctor only once or twice per 72
- Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news During the same time period most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerned with 78
- Men and women because of their inherent physical differences are not equally suited for many tasks Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to add 50
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your pos 83
- The following is a letter from the parent of a private school student to the principal of that school Last year Kensington Academy turned over management of its cafeteria to a private vendor Swift Nutrition This company serves low fat low calorie meal 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 98, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...e our standard of life, therefore it is be a good indicator for a great nation. Fo...
^^
Line 4, column 618, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'criterion'?
Suggestion: criterion
...y certain achievement could be a proper criteria to evaluate a nation. Thus, the autho...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in general, in summary, sort of, such as, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2158.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 422.0 442.535393258 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11374407583 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90960910025 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545023696682 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 693.9 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.956364177 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.578947368 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2105263158 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.63157894737 5.21951772744 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330197924489 0.243740707755 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10110238838 0.0831039109588 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1045737338 0.0758088955206 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192621261522 0.150359130593 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387908200467 0.0667264976115 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.