Summarize the points made it the lecture you just heard, explaining how they cast doubt on points made in the reading passage.
It has been a controversy surrounding whether bees existed on Earth 200 million years ago. Some people, like the author of the article, think that the discovered old fossil structures that look like bee nets were not produced by ancient bees. In the other hands, some people, like the professor in the lecturer, rebut the arguments in the reading passage.
To begin with, the professor disputes the point in the article that the absence of bees’ fossil 200 million ago indicate that those structures are not bees' creatures. She elaborates on this by pointing out that the specific tree's liquid which is necessary to form a bees' fossil, might not have existed then. This means that bees' body could not be preserved to be discovered by nowadays people.
In addition, the article mentions that the first flower appeared on Earth 125 million years ago, implying that bees are impossible to exist at the time of those fossil structures. However, the lecturer contradicts this argument by suggesting that ancient bees might have lived on other plants. Therefore, the fact of the absence of flowering plants cannot prove that the fossil structures were not created by bees.
Finally, the professor concurs that some structures in modern bees' nests were not found, while she puts the emphasize on other evidences. She says that some chemical evident such as water proofing material was found in that fossil structures, which means that these structures were somehow made by bees.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 267, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'bees'' or 'bee's'?
Suggestion: bees'; bee's
...ees liquid which is necessary to form a bees fossil, might not have existed then. Th...
^^^^
Line 7, column 105, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...es nests were not found, while she puts the emphasize on other evidences. She says that some ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, look, so, then, therefore, while, in addition, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 7.30242825607 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1241.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 244.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08606557377 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46183922676 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540983606557 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 371.7 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.0245078957 49.2860985944 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.818181818 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1818181818 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.36363636364 7.06452816374 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0518183232543 0.272083759551 19% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0213248763869 0.0996497079465 21% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0244781770822 0.0662205650399 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0317874316711 0.162205337803 20% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0180686929398 0.0443174109184 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.