A glance at people's attitude toward celebrities brings to the light a question that has been asked several times, namely, whether famous entertainers need to have more privacy or not. Although teenagers believe that their role models like to be popular and have less privacy, I, as a close friend of a well-known artist reject this opinion that support privacy right for popular celebrities.
The foremost reason why I am supporting this idea lies in the fact that as human being, we all have same needs and rights. It does not matter whether we are famous or unknown persons, we have secrets, difficult days, and embarrassing memories. For example, even Brad Pitt cries somedays and need to be alone without being watched by news reporters. Recently, Angelina Juli said that after her divorce, she got a severe depression because of rumors in the news, so she preferred not to come out of the house. This fact that we know some body does not give us the right to annoy him whenever he is in public. Therefore, it is a great suggestion to give athletes more privacy to feel comfortable.
Another subtle point that I should deem is the fact that ordinary life is like a dream for famous people. They cannot go to low level restaurant because people anticipate that they spend only on expensive foods while they want to bite a cheap snack from Mc Donald. If they keep themselves in their houses similar to prison, what does popularity bring for them? They can buy expensive houses, cars, and jewelries, but they are deprived from having free life. Most actors and actress are not seen in public without make-up which put a big burden on their shoulders. Thus, more privacy gives them the opportunity to live however they want.
Nevertheless, since we love our outstanding athletes, we are interested to know about their lifestyle and success. Specially young adults who want to find a successful person to imitate his behavior asserts that celebrities advises helps them to find their ways. However, this concern can be eliminated if well-known individuals hold some public gathering and meeting to answer their fans' questions. So, this opinion does not have any conflict with more privacy.
Due to the aforementioned argument explored in the previous statements, I highly recommend paparazzis to allow famous people live freely without any worry of be seen in yellow magazines. It is necessary for a society to protect all peoples' right and do not trespass private boundaries.
- Choose one of the following transportation vehicles and explain why you think it has changed people's lives.1. Automobiles 2. Bicycles 3.AirplanesUse specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents are the best teachers. 80
- In order to attract more tourists the government could either improve safety by hiring more police or improve its appearance by repairing old buildings and streets Which way do you think is more effective 68
- Choose one of the following transportation vehicles and explain why you think it has changed people's lives.1. Automobiles 2. Bicycles 3.AirplanesUse specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 531, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'somebody'?
Suggestion: somebody
...ut of the house. This fact that we know some body does not give us the right to annoy him...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2062.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 418.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93301435407 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60607475902 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 212.727598566 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622009569378 0.524837075471 119% => OK
syllable_count: 644.4 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.321534416 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.1 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85 5.45110844103 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181429130391 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0533845269838 0.076458572812 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501069371867 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0934752473746 0.150856017488 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419149122678 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.